首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines >Comparison Between the Effects of 10 Repetition 2 Sets Footwork with 5 Repetition 4 Sets Footwork for Improving Trainees' Agility in Badminton Training
【24h】

Comparison Between the Effects of 10 Repetition 2 Sets Footwork with 5 Repetition 4 Sets Footwork for Improving Trainees' Agility in Badminton Training

机译:10重复2件效果之间的比较,用5重复4次套装步法,用于改善羽毛球训练中的培训率

获取原文

摘要

Aimed at comparing the effectiveness of footwork with 10 repetition 2 set and with 5 repetition 4 set footwork, this study was conducted in pretest-posttest control group design, involving 42 male badminton students enrolled in professional training program of Ganesha University of Education. Group 1 was given footwork with 10 repetitions 2 sets and group 2 was given footwork with 5 repetitions 4 sets. The increase of the agility between both the groups before and after the training was tested with the t-independent test with a significant score of α = 0.05. The average agility showed that both groups experienced an increased effect of (p<0.05), with the increase of group 1 higher then the increase of group 2. Thus, the footwork with 10 repetitions 2 sets was proven to be more effective in improving the students' agility than the footwork with 5 repetitions 4 sets.
机译:旨在将步法的有效性与10重复2组进行比较,并用5重复4次套装步法,该研究进行了预先测试的后测试组设计,涉及42名雄性羽毛球学生,注册了Ganesha教育大学专业培训计划。 第1组被给予步法,10次重复2套,第2组与5次重复4套给出的步法。 在训练前后的群体之间的敏捷性的增加是用T的独立试验测试,具有α= 0.05的显着得分。 平均灵活性显示,两组的效果增加了(P <0.05),随着第1组的增加,第2组的增加。因此,已被证明具有10个重复2套的步法,以更有效地改善 学生的敏捷比5重复4套的步法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号