In nuclear facilities, the transfer of fissile material in solution, gas or powder forms between process stages requires many transfer lines (called "pipes" in this paper) which may be laid out into bundles or networks. In Nuclear Criticality Safety evaluations, it is usual to assimilate such networks as a unique cylinder which area bounds the sum of the surface of pipes making up the network. However, even if this geometric simplification appears intuitively safe, it is not conservative in all cases. The aim of this paper is therefore to explore the validity and limitations associated to the assessment of pipes networks by a unique cylinder. This paper presents the impact on the keff value of a detailed modeling of a pipes network compared to a unique cylinder. Variables of interest considered in such calculations are pipes diameter, composition, pitches and layout. Fissile media taken into account are uranium systems enriched from 5 % to 93.5 % in ~(235)U. Then, the impact on reactivity of pipes material, such as stainless steel or plastic, is discussed and the minimal or maximal safe thickness of material has been determined. Finally, this paper provides guidance on the nuclear criticality safety assessment of pipes networks for uranium systems.
展开▼