首页> 外文会议>Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium >Measuring Student Competency in University Introductory Computer Programming: Epistemological and Methodological Foundations
【24h】

Measuring Student Competency in University Introductory Computer Programming: Epistemological and Methodological Foundations

机译:衡量大学介绍性计算机编程的学生能力:认识论和方法论基础

获取原文

摘要

University introductory programming courses, commonly referred to as Computer Science 1 (CS1), are beset by a paucity of invariant measures of programming competency. Common evaluative tools such as university exams are characterised by a lack of standardised scaling protocols, the absence of construct models to inform instrument design, and inconsistent selection of substantive content. These shortcomings severely limit the provision of meaningful data for pedagogic and research purposes. Typically, in most CS1 pedagogical research, the raw scores obtained from in-class tests and formal examinations are treated as measures of student competence. Thus, the veracity of statistical associations tested in these studies and the corresponding recommendations for pedagogic reform are questionable. A growing need has thus arisen for instruments to provide meaningful measurement of CS1 student competence. This report concerns the first phase in the development of an instrument to measure CS1 student competency. The overall methodological frame was the Unified Theory of Validity and the seven aspects of evidence applicable to an argument for validity. These were the content aspect, the substantive aspect, the structural aspect, the generalizability aspect, the external aspect, the consequential aspect and the interpretability aspect. The report concentrates on the qualitative procedures applied to deal with the literature, previous research, and existing instruments. The unified conception of validity emphasises construct validity and accordingly this report recounts in detail the garnering of content aspect evidence including the purpose, the domain of inference, the types of inferences, constraints and limitations, instrument specification--the construct, instrument specification--the construct model, instrument specification - the construct map, item development, the scoring model, the scaling model, and item technical quality. The next phase of the project is the subject of a second report and it is anticipated this will focus more on empirical procedures and results through application of the Rasch Partial Credit Model.
机译:大学介绍性编程课程通常被称为计算机科学1(CS1),通过不变的编程能力措施的缺陷。大学考试等常见评估工具的特点是缺乏标准化的缩放协议,没有构造模型,可以为仪器设计提供信息,并不一致选择实质内容。这些缺点严重限制了为教学和研究目的提供有意义的数据。通常,在大多数CS1教学研究中,从课堂测试和正规检查获得的原始评分被视为学生能力的衡量标准。因此,在这些研究中测试的统计协会的真实性和对教学改革的相应建议是值得怀疑的。因此,由于仪器提供了不断增长的需求,以提供CS1学生能力的有意义的测量。本报告涉及开发仪器以衡量CS1学生能力的第一阶段。整体方法框架是统一的有效性理论,以及适用于有效性的论证的证据的七个方面。这些是内容方面,实质方面,结构方面,概括方面,外部方面,相应的方面和解释方面。该报告专注于适用于处理文献,以前的研究和现有工具的定性程序。有效性的统一概念强调构建有效性,并因此详细叙述了内容方面证据的追加,包括目的,推理领域的推论,制约和限制类型,仪器规范 - 构造,仪表规范 - 构建模型,仪表规范 - 构造地图,项目开发,评分模型,缩放模型和项目技术质量。该项目的下一阶段是第二次报告的主题,预计这将通过应用Rasch部分信用模式来更加关注实证程序和结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号