首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Image and Data Fusion >ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF LANDSAT-DERIVED CONTINUOUS FIELDS OF TREE COVER PRODUCTS USING AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES
【24h】

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF LANDSAT-DERIVED CONTINUOUS FIELDS OF TREE COVER PRODUCTS USING AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES

机译:使用Airbore Lidar数据在美国东部地区覆盖土地覆盖产品连续领域的准确性评估

获取原文

摘要

Knowing the detailed error structure of a land cover map is crucial for area estimation. Facilitated by the opening of the Landsat archive, global land cover mapping at 30-m resolution has become possible in recent years. Two global Landsat-based continuous fields of tree cover maps have been generated by Sexton et al. (2013) and Hansen et al. (2013) but the accuracy of which have not been comprehensively evaluated. Here we used canopy cover derived from airborne small-footprint Lidar data as a reference to evaluate the accuracy of these two datasets as well as the National Land Cover Database 2001 canopy cover layer (Homer et al. 2004) in two entire counties in Maryland, United States. Our results showed that all three Landsat datasets captured well the spatial variations of tree cover in the study area with an r2 ranging between 0.54 and 0.58, a mean bias error ranging between -15% and 5% tree cover, and a root mean square error ranging between 27% and 29% tree cover. When the continuous tree cover maps were converted to binary forest/nonforest maps, all three products were proved to have an overall accuracy >= 80% but with significant differences in producer's accuracy and user's accuracy. Data users are thus suggested to beware of these accuracy patterns when selecting the most appropriate dataset for their specific applications.
机译:了解陆地覆盖地图的详细错误结构对于区域估计至关重要。近年来,由Landsat档案开通,全球土地覆盖映射为30米,近年来已成为可能。 Sexton等人已经生成了两个全球基于Landsat的树木覆盖图的连续领域。 (2013)和Hansen等人。 (2013)但尚未全面评估的准确性。在这里,我们使用从机载的小型覆盖范围数据的遮盖盖作为参考,以评估这两个数据集的准确性以及国家土地覆盖数据库2001个冠层2001年覆盖层(Homer等,2004)在马里兰的两个整个县,美国。我们的研究结果表明,所有三个Landsat数据集都捕获了研究区域中树盖的空间变化,R2之间的r2在0.54和0.58之间,平均偏置误差在-15%和5%的树木覆盖之间,以及根均方误差在27%和29%的树木覆盖范围之间。当连续树木覆盖图转换为二元森林/非终端地图时,所有三种产品都被证明具有总体精度> = 80%,但在生产者的准确性和用户的准确性方面具有显着差异。因此,数据用户在为其特定应用程序选择最合适的数据集时,请注意这些准确性模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号