首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Biomedical Engineering in Vietnam >A Measure of Clinical Outcomes in Dental Implant Surgery Flapless Surgery versus Flap Technique in Posterior Maxilla of Post Menopause Women
【24h】

A Measure of Clinical Outcomes in Dental Implant Surgery Flapless Surgery versus Flap Technique in Posterior Maxilla of Post Menopause Women

机译:牙科植入物手术无牙科手术临床结果的衡量标准术后妇女后颌骨后颌骨瓣技术

获取原文

摘要

The aim of this study is to examine the clinical outcomes of implants inserted using split mouth study and to measure patients' satisfaction using visual analogue scale in flapless and conventional flap techniques in post menopause women age 50 years or over. Materials and methods: This study is a retrospective split mouth study of flapless vs flap technique involving the study of dental records of 16 post-menopause of patients undergoing bilateral implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. A total of 45 implants with no augmentative procedures were selected from 16 patients for the study. The patients were divided into two groups: the control group had 21 implants placed by full flap technique, and the test group consisted of 24 implants inserted using flapless procedure. Only those patients with comprehensive clinical record were included in this study. The treatment outcomes were measured using key words: implant survival, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Periotest, x-ray assessment. Results and Discussion: The results showed that flapless surgery had comparable, similar results as compare to flap surgery: survival rate (95.8% and 95.2%), Using visual analogue scale (VAS=0 to 10), flapless surgery revealed to have less: pain, swelling, bleeding and speech impairment and had better overall satisfaction at one day and one week than flap technique than the flap counterpart (*P<0.05). No significant difference in bone resorption at 3 months. After one year, bone change in the flap group vs the flapless group was statistically significant 1-0.53 (±0.57) vs +0.08 (±0.49), **P<0.005]. No significant difference in Periotest value (PTV). Conclusion: This study showed that implant flapless surgery is a minimal invasive, effective, and novel technique that can render a significantly better early stage satisfaction outcome as compare to the traditional flap method. Flapless implantation resulted in minimal bone loss, less pain, less complications, and comparable good PTV.
机译:本研究的目的是检查使用分裂口研究插入的植入物的临床结果,并测量患者使用Valpless中的视觉模拟规模的患者满意度,并在50岁或超过50岁或以上的妇女期间的常规皮瓣技术。材料和方法:本研究是一项追溯裂口研究的术语,涉及研究后颌颌骨双侧植入手术患者牙科记录的牙科记录。共有45例没有增强程序的植入物选自16名患者进行该研究。将患者分为两组:对照组通过全襟翼技术进行了21种植入物,并且测试组由24种植入物组成,使用浮断程序插入。只有那些患有综合临床记录的患者均包含在本研究中。使用关键词测量治疗结果:植入物存活,视觉模拟量表(VAS),无源,X射线评估。结果与讨论:结果表明,与翼片手术相比,瓣瓣手术具有可比性,类似的结果:使用视觉模拟量表(VAS = 0至10),Flacepless手术显示较少的效果(95.8%和95.2%),透露:疼痛,肿胀,出血和言语障碍,并在一天内完全满意,而不是PLAP技术比襟翼对手(* P <0.05)。 3个月内骨吸收无显着差异。一年后,骨折组VS骨骼变化差异有致命显着的1-0.53(±0.57)Vs + 0.08(±0.49),** P <0.005]。无痛苦(PTV)没有显着差异。结论:本研究表明,植入性浮动手术是一种最小的侵入性,有效和新的技术,可以使早期的早期满意度结果显着更好地与传统的皮瓣方法相比。蠕动植入导致骨质损失最小,疼痛较少,并发症较少,以及可比的PTV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号