首页> 外文会议>Symposium on uncertainty in fire standards and what to do about it >In Search of Standard Reference Materials for ASTM E05 Fire Standards
【24h】

In Search of Standard Reference Materials for ASTM E05 Fire Standards

机译:寻找ASTM E05 Fire标准的标准参考材料

获取原文

摘要

The first paragraph of E-691, Standard Practice for Conducting an Inter-laboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method [ASTM E691-05, 2005, "Standard Practice for Conducting an Inter-laboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method," ASTM Book of Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.] states: 'Tests performed on presumably identical materials in presumably identical circumstances do not, in general, yield identical results. This is attributed to unavoidable random errors inherent in every test procedure; the factors that may influence the outcome of a test cannot all be completely controlled." Further in the same paragraph the factors are identified: "Many different factors (apart from random variations between supposedly identical specimens) may contribute to the variability in application of a test method, including: a. the operator, b. equipment used, c. calibration of equipment, and d. environment." The primary subjects of both the first and second paragraphs are: "presumably (supposedly) identical materials". If, in fact, "identical materials" were available, one of the variables of testing would be eliminated because the performance of the material would be a known, which could be used for calibration procedures. Thus, any variations in the test results would be caused by a, b, or d. The Holy Grail of ASTM fire standards is the precision and bias section. ASTM regulations require precision statements in all test methods in terms of repeatability and reproducibility. However, most E05 standards do not provide precision and bias data. In fact, only 33% of E05 standards have conducted an inter-laboratory study or round robin at some time. A path forward to promote more systematic calibration procedures for E05 fire test methods and to facilitate more frequent round robin studies, is to explore the identification or development of Standard Reference Materials (SRM's) with defined properties for calibration of ASTM E05 fire tests and to validate operational performance for the same test method conducted at different facilities. Surveys of a wide range of ASTM test standards show that some of them use well-characterized materials to provide specific output data as part of their calibration procedures. In fact, SRM's have been developed for test standards; E162, E648 and E662. This paper summarizes the properties of the materials used for test calibration and their potential use as reference standards or for identifying properties important to formulating a standard material(s) for ASTM E05 fire test methods.
机译:e-691的第一段,进行实验室内研究的标准做法,以确定测试方法的精度[ASTM E691-05,2005,“进行实验室研究的标准做法,以确定测试的精度方法,“ASTM标准书,ASTM International,West Conshococken,PA。):'对大概相同的情况进行的测试表明,一般来说,产生相同的结果。这归因于每个测试程序中固有的不可避免的随机错误;可能影响测试结果的因素不能完全被完全控制。“进一步在同一段中确定了因素:”除了据称相同标本之间的随机变化之外,许多不同的因素可能有助于应用A的可​​变性测试方法,包括:a。运营商,b。使用的设备,c。校准设备,D。环境。“第一个和第二段的主要科目是:”大概(据说)相同的材料“。如果实际上,如果”相同的材料“可用,则会消除其中一个测试变量,因为性能材料是已知的,可用于校准程序。因此,测试结果中的任何变化都是由A,B或D引起的。ASTM火标准的神圣凸杯是精度和偏置部分。ASTM法规需要所有测试方法的精确陈述在可重复性和可重复性方面。然而,大多数E05标准都不提供精确和偏置数据。事实上,只有33%的E05标准已经在一段时间内进行了实验室学习或循环罗宾。一个向前推进更系统的校准程序的道路用于E05防火试验方法,并促进更频繁的循环研究,是探索标准参考资料(SRM)的识别或开发ITH定义的ASTM E05防火测试的属性,并验证在不同设施中相同的测试方法的操作性能。广泛的ASTM测试标准的调查显示,其中一些使用良好特征的材料来提供特定的输出数据作为其校准程序的一部分。事实上,SRM已开发用于测试标准; E162,E648和E662。本文总结了用于测试校准的材料的性质及其作为参考标准的潜在用途,或者用于识别用于为ASTM E05防火试验方法制定标准材料的特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号