首页> 外文会议>Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade >FISHING AGREEMENTS AND MACROECONOMIC DEPENDENCE: A GAME THEORY APPROACH OF THE EU-ACP FRAMEWORK
【24h】

FISHING AGREEMENTS AND MACROECONOMIC DEPENDENCE: A GAME THEORY APPROACH OF THE EU-ACP FRAMEWORK

机译:捕捞协议和宏观经济依赖性:欧盟-CAP框架的博弈论方法

获取原文

摘要

Since January 2008, the fishing agreements between the European Union and ACP (African, Caribbean, Pacific) countries have changed to comply with WTO rules and improve the management of the fisheries. However, the poor countries depend perhaps too heavily on foreign aids to impose any management system to the distant water fishing nations. A classical game theory approach (fishwar model) is revisited to take into consideration the macroeconomic dependence of developing countries and identify the theoretical conditions (time preferences, compensatory payment level, negotiation leadership) under which the stock can increase and the countries share the resources. In this game, each ACP country has its own EEZ of a natural stock and can fish on its ownor partly sell the access to the EU fleet (quota) against a compensatory amount. The Nash equilibrium context is compared to two Stackelberg settings.
机译:自2008年1月以来,欧盟和ACP(非洲,加勒比,太平洋)国家之间的渔业协议已经改变为遵守WTO规则,并改善渔业管理。然而,穷国仍然依赖于外国艾滋病,将任何管理系统施加到遥远的水渔国。经典博弈论方法(FishWar模型)被重新考虑到发展中国家的宏观经济依赖,并确定股票可以增加的理论条件(时间偏好,补偿性支付水平,谈判领导),各国共享资源。在这场比赛中,每个ACP国家都有自己的EEZ自然股票,并且可以在其所有者身上捕捞,部分销售对欧盟舰队(配额)的访问权抵制补偿金额。将纳什均衡上下文与两个Stackelberg设置进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号