首页> 外文会议>EVOLANG 9 >ON SOME PARALLELS BETWEEN THE VOCAL APPARATUS AND MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE AND MUSIC
【24h】

ON SOME PARALLELS BETWEEN THE VOCAL APPARATUS AND MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE AND MUSIC

机译:在声乐设备和乐器之间的一些相似之处,以及对语言和音乐演变的后果

获取原文

摘要

In this paper we argue that (1) the vocal apparatus and musical instruments are both source-filter devices; (2) the way these devices work help us understand what phonological and melodic sound systems share and what they don't; (3) this comparative approach can shed light on the evolution of language and music. The Source-Filter Theory (Fant, 1960), asserts that the speech sounds result from two consecutive processes: a source produces an initial sound and a filter modifies it. Basically, when a human speaks the vibration of the vocal cords function as a glottal source of energy and the displacement of the organs of the mouth and throat function as the filter. The combined action of source and filter produces the two phonological macro-categories, consonants and vowels. With this mechanism, a human can produce thousands of syllables, which are the basic building blocks of speech. The English syllables inventory, for example, runs to something around 16,000 syllables (Barker, s.d.). Musical instruments can be seen as source-filter devices as well. The source-function can be performed by the strings of a guitar, the wooden bars of a xylophone, the reed of a clarinet, and so on, while the filter-function is performed by sound boxes and tubes in many different shapes and sizes, built from a whole array of different materials. However, musical instruments present a crucial difference in relation to the vocal apparatus: their filters are permanently static. One can pluck or bow the strings of a violin but one cannot change the shape of its body. This is true for any melodic instrument, even for those which apparently have a movable filter, like the jew's harp or the trombone, for example. As tones are the outcome of the source vibration, we have nothing but tones as the output of a musical instrument. In this order of ideas, the mobility of the filter seems to be the key factor distinguishing musical and linguistic sounds, which are therefore organized in systems conversely oriented.
机译:在本文中,我们认为(1)声乐设备和乐器都是源过滤器件; (2)这些设备工作的方式有助于我们了解哪些语音和旋律声音系统的份额以及它们没有什么; (3)这种比较方法可以阐明语言和音乐的演变。源 - 过滤器理论(FINT,1960)断言,语音声音是由两个连续的进程产生的:源产生初始声音,过滤器修改它。基本上,当人类讲述声带的振动时,用作嘴巴和喉部的器官的光源和喉部的位移作为过滤器。源和过滤器的组合作用产生两个语音宏类别,辅音和元音。通过这种机制,人类可以产生成千上万的音节,这是语音的基本构建块。例如,英文音节库存运行到大约16,000个音节(Barker,S.D.)的东西。乐器也可以被视为源过滤器件。源功能可以由吉他的弦,木琴的木制条,单簧管的簧片等,而滤波器功能由许多不同形状和尺寸的声音箱和管子执行,由一系列不同材料建造。然而,乐器呈现与声乐设备相关的关键差异:它们的过滤器是永久静态的。人们可以拔出或鞠躬小提琴的弦,但是一个人不能改变身体的形状。例如,这对于任何旋律仪器来说都是如此,即使是那些显然具有可移动过滤器的那些,例如犹太人的竖琴或长号。随着音调是源振动的结果,我们只有音调的声音,只有音乐仪器的输出。在这种思想的顺序中,过滤器的移动性似乎是区分音乐和语言声音的关键因素,因此在相反地的系统中组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号