首页> 外文会议>SPIE Conference on Computer-Aided Diagnosis >Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in CT: False positivereduction by combining multiple classifiers
【24h】

Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in CT: False positivereduction by combining multiple classifiers

机译:通过组合多分类器自动检测CT中的肺结节:误报点

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of various classifier combination methods for improving the performance of a CAD system for pulmonary nodule detection in CT. We employed CT cases in the publicly available lung image database consortium (LIDC) dataset, which included 85 CT cases with 110 nodules. We first used six individual classifiers for nodule detection in CT, including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), artificial neural network (ANN), and three types of support vector machines (SVM). Five information-fusion methods were then employed to combine the classifiers' outputs for improving detection performance. The five combination methods included two supervised (likelihood ratio method and neural network) and three unsupervised ones (the mean, the product, and the majority-vote of the output scores from the six individual classifiers). Leave-one-case-out was employed to train and test individual classifiers and supervised combination methods. At a sensitivity of 80 %, the numbers of false positives per case for the six individual classifiers were 6.1 for LDA, 19.9 for QDA, 8.6 for ANN, 23.7 for SVM-dot, 17.0 for SVM-poly, and 23.35 for SVM-ANOVA; the numbers of false positives per case for the five combination methods were 3.4 for the majority-vote rule, 6.2 for the mean, 5.7 for the product, 9.7 for the neural network, and 28.1 for the likelihood ratio method. The majority-vote rule achieved higher performance levels than other combination methods. It also achieved higher performance than the best individual classifier, which is not the case for other combination methods.
机译:本研究的目的是研究各种分类器组合方法的有用性,以改善CT中肺结核检测的CAD系统的性能。我们在公开可用的肺部图像数据库联盟(LIDC)数据集中用CT案例,其中包括85个CT患者110个结节。我们首先在CT中使用了六种单独的结节检测分类器,包括线性判别分析(LDA),二次判别分析(QDA),人工神经网络(ANN)和三种类型的支持向量机(SVM)。然后采用五种信息融合方法来组合分类器的输出来提高检测性能。五种组合方法包括两个监督(似然比方法和神经网络)和三个无监督的(平均值,产品,以及来自六个单独分类器的输出分数的大多数投票)。留下一例案例用于培训和测试各个分类器和监督组合方法。在敏感度为80%时,六种单独分类器的每个案例的误报数为6.1,对于LDA,19.9的QDA,8.6,SVM-DOT的23.7,SVM-Poly的17.0,以及SVM-Anova的23.35 ;五种组合方法每个案例的误报的数量为3.4,适用于大多数投票规则,6.2为均值为5.7,为神经网络为9.7,以及28.1的可能性比例。大多数投票规则达到比其他组合方法更高的性能水平。它还达到比最佳单独分类器更高的性能,这不是其他组合方法的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号