首页> 外文会议>Text Analysis Conference >The University of Sheffield System at TAC KBP 2010
【24h】

The University of Sheffield System at TAC KBP 2010

机译:谢菲尔德大学在TAC KBP 2010

获取原文

摘要

This paper describes the University of Sheffield's entry in the 2010 TAC KBP entity linking and slot filling tasks. This was our first participation in the TAC KBP track. Given limited human resources and a relatively late decision to participate, we chose to view our participation as an exploratory effort, aimed at educating us in the issues surrounding the tasks. With that perspective we decided to first adopt a fairly naive approach, see where it went wrong, then refine the approach as time permitted. Our first "naive" approach to the entity linking (EL) task was to build a text collection from the textual description portion of the KB nodes, index this collection using a search engine tool, convert the EL query into a search engine query and return the top ranked KB node whose name matched the entity name in the query as the answer to the query, provided the similarity score between the query and the KB node exceeded some threshold. Analysis of the failures of this approach suggested that a major problem was the insistence that a KB node name must match the query entity name exactly. The rest of our effort on the EL task went into exploring how we could relax this assumption.
机译:本文介绍了谢菲尔德大学在2010年TAC KBP实体链接和插槽填写任务中的条目。这是我们第一次参与TAC KBP轨道。鉴于人力资源有限和相对较晚的决定参与,我们选择将参与视为一种探索性努力,旨在教育我们在围绕任务周围的问题上。通过这种观点,我们决定首先采用相当朴素的方法,看看它在哪里出错,然后在允许的时间内完善这种方法。我们的第一个“Naive”方法对实体链接(EL)任务是从KB节点的文本描述部分构建文本集合,使用搜索引擎工具索引此集合,将EL查询转换为搜索引擎查询并返回名称匹配查询中的实体名称作为查询的答案的名称匹配的顶级KB节点,提供了查询和KB节点之间的相似性得分超出了一些阈值。这种方法的失败分析表明,主要问题是坚持KB节点名称必须完全匹配查询实体名称。我们对EL任务的其余努力进入探索我们如何放松这种假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号