首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >USE OF CASE STUDIES AND A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS TOOL TO ENGAGE UNDERGRADUATE BIOENGINEERING STUDENTS IN ETHICS EDUCATION
【24h】

USE OF CASE STUDIES AND A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS TOOL TO ENGAGE UNDERGRADUATE BIOENGINEERING STUDENTS IN ETHICS EDUCATION

机译:使用案例研究和系统分析工具在伦理教育中聘用本科生物工程学生

获取原文

摘要

In addition to developing technical skills, engineering undergraduates must also be prepared to navigate the ethical issues they will encounter during their professional careers. In bioengineering in particular, students must be prepared to identify and solve the wide variety of ethics problems encountered in this rapidly-progressing field. Because of the importance of ethics education in engineering, ABET criteria for accreditation includes the requirement that graduating students be equipped with an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility and the ability to engage in engineering design while considering ethical, economic, environmental, social, and safety constraints. At the University of Washington, this requirement is satisfied by addressing ethical responsibility and engineering ethics problems throughout the bioengineering curriculum. Students are first exposed to ethical issues in the context of bioengineering in a recently-implemented course entitled Introduction to Bioengineering Problem Solving, BIOEN 215. This course serves as the foundation for the later bioengineering courses which also involve ethics instruction, including junior-level core courses and the Capstone Senior Design sequence. In this paper, we present our approach to engaging students in bioethics, through the use of case studies and a systematic tool that can be used to solve any type of ethics problem. During the initial two offerings of BIOEN 215 in 2011, case studies were utilized to introduce students to the wide range of possible ethics problems in bioengineering and to illustrate the complexity of ethical challenges. Students were introduced to case studies involving human subjects, medical device risk, research misconduct, and clinical trials in developing countries. Established medical research guidelines, ethical theories, and professional codes of ethics were discussed in the context of case studies. Case studies encompassed situations faced by clinicians, medical researchers, undergraduates, etc. and were presented to students and subsequently analyzed in groups. In addition to identifying ethical issues, students must be able to actually solve ethics problems. Thus, in this course we taught students an ethical analysis tool, the Four A's. The Four A's was first introduced by Budinger and Budinger in the text Ethics of Emerging Technologies and is a strategy to systematically apply guidelines when assessing the multiple aspects of an ethical problem, so that alternate solutions can be generated and evaluated. Students were taught the steps of the strategy through lectures and reading assignments and then were asked to apply the technique to a specific case. Based on student performance data, instructor observations, and student feedback, the case studies and Four A's strategy were effective methods for engaging students in ethics education. Case-based learning was used to convey the real-world importance of ethical issues. Students were able to utilize the Four A's strategy to thoroughly research, analyze, and solve ethics problems. Student feedback was overall positive, citing that having a structured framework with which to approach an ethics problem was valuable. Based on initial results, these techniques will help equip students with the understanding and the tools necessary to handle more complex ethical problems as they progress throughout their academic and professional careers.
机译:除了开发技术技能外,还必须准备工程本科生,以导航他们在职业生涯中遇到的道德问题。特别是在生物工程中,必须准备学生识别和解决这一迅速发展领域中遇到的各种伦理问题。由于伦理教育在工程中的重要性,ABET认证标准包括毕业生能够理解专业和道德责任的要求以及参与工程设计的能力,同时考虑道德,经济,环境,社会和安全约束。在华盛顿大学,通过解决整个生物工程课程的道德责任和工程伦理问题,满足了这一要求。在最近实施的课程中,学生将在生物工程的背景下暴露于题为生物工程问题的概要问题的生物工程,生物学215.本课程为后期生物工程课程的基础,也涉及伦理教学,包括初级核心课程和Capstone高级设计序列。在本文中,我们通过使用案例研究和可用于解决任何类型的道德问题的系统工具来提出我们在生物伦理中的学生参与生物伦理的方法。在2011年的Bioen 215的初始发布期间,利用案例研究将学生引入生物工程中的各种可能的道德问题,并说明道德挑战的复杂性。介绍了涉及人类受试者,医疗器械风险,研究不端和发展中国家临床试验的案例研究。在案例研究的背景下讨论了建立的医学研究指南,道德理论和专业的道德规范。案例研究包括临床医生,医学研究人员,本科生等面临的情况,并呈现给学生并随后分析。除了识别道德问题外,学生必须能够实际解决道德问题。因此,在本课程中,我们教授学生道德分析工具,这是四个A的。这四个A由Budinger和Budinger在新兴技术的文本伦理中首次引入,并且在评估道德问题的多个方面时,系统地应用指南的策略,从而可以生成和评估替代解决方案。学生通过讲座和阅读作业教授策略的步骤,然后要求将该技术应用于特定情况。根据学生绩效数据,教练观察和学生反馈,案例研究和四个策略是让学生参与道德教育的有效方法。基于案例的学习被用来传达伦理问题的真实重要性。学生能够利用四个A的战略来彻底研究,分析和解决道德问题。学生反馈总体是积极的,引用具有涉及道德问题的结构化框架是有价值的。根据初步结果,这些技术将有助于为学生提供理解和在整个学术和专业职业的过​​程中处理更复杂的道德问题所需的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号