首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN CONTEXT: AN EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTION SYSTEM
【24h】

ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN CONTEXT: AN EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTION SYSTEM

机译:背景技术教育:基于证据的干预系统

获取原文

摘要

An evidence-based intervention system is proposed to provide for guided evolution of engineering education programs. Too often, innovative designs for educational enhancement fall into disrepair because they embodied the unintended consequence of built-in obsolescence. The ineffectiveness of many designs has been resident in a static view of learning and teaching styles, personnel-dependence, an inability to manage changes in program size, and/or a lack of portability and adoption by the larger educational community. To avoid these specific pitfalls in our design for educational enhancement, we are: (1) employing a dynamic view of learning and teaching styles where the characteristics of student and faculty are periodically measured to establish an assessment process calibration, (2) using knowledge management systems to process voluminous data collection and analysis in an efficient and flexible manner, (3) using a modular design of an established assessment paradigm that provides points of real-time intervention to responsively optimize educational practices, and (4) using a widely-practiced assessment paradigm that confers transferability of the process with its value-added, best-practices modifications to other educational systems. The approach to accomplish these goals is based upon decision support software currently in use in business and health care. The implementation of Instructional Decision Support System (IDSS) approaches will provide rapid feedback of assessment data combined with student characteristics to empower faculty instructors and enhance student learning. Preliminary data has provided a basic proof-of-concept for the IDSS approach. Data from the Index of Learning Styles indicated that the students surveyed were sequential, as opposed to global, learners. Instructors found that redesigning some courses to provide a more sequential, step-by-step style enhanced the student experience in selected courses. Other data showed that students surveyed were not as positively inclined towards engineering as might be expected for a biomedical engineering program. If confirmed, this data can be used to provide support for developing new educational experiences targeted to improve students' attitudes towards the discipline.
机译:以证据为基础的干预系统建议为工程教育计划的引导进化。很多时候,教育增强创新设计失修,因为它们体现的意想不到的后果内置过时。许多设计的效率低下一直居住在学习和教学风格,人才的依赖,没有能力管理程序大小的变化,和/或通过较大的教育界缺乏便携性和采用的静态视图。为了避免我们的教育增强设计这些特定的陷阱,我们有:(1)采用使用知识管理的学习和教学风格,其中学生和教师的特点,定期测量,以建立一个评估过程校准的动态视图,(2)系统使用已建立的评估范例,提供实时干预的点,以作为响应优化教育实践的模块化设计来处理以有效和灵活的方式大量的数据收集和分析,(3),并使用(4)一种广泛实践评估范例,其增值,最佳实践修改其他教育系统的过程中赋予转让。实现这些目标的方法是基于目前在商业和卫生保健的使用决策支持软件。教学决策支持系统(IDSS)的实施办法将提供学生的特点,赋权教师教官和促进学生学习相结合的评估数据的快速反馈。初步数据提供了IDSS的方法基本验证的概念。从学习方式的指数数据显示,接受调查的学生们连续的,而不是全球性的,学习者。教师发现,重新设计了一些课程,以提供更连续的,一步一步的风格增强在选择课程的学生的经验。其他数据显示,在接受调查的学生不如积极朝着倾斜设计可以预料的生物医学工程计划。如果得到证实,这些数据可以用来为开发目标,以提高学生对学科的态度新的教育经验的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号