首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference >Comparing the total cost of goods from traditional distributors to total costs under vendor management
【24h】

Comparing the total cost of goods from traditional distributors to total costs under vendor management

机译:将传统经销商的总成本与供应商管理下的总成本进行比较

获取原文

摘要

Vendor-managed inventories (VMI) are a great boon for manufacturers-when skillfully implemented-because they provide for lower inventories, lower overall costs, a multitude of risk management advantages, and improved service levels. Far-sighted manufacturers who have adopted VMI see cost savings and service improvements that belie the larger dollar figure shown on each product invoice. As is usual in education, it is quite simple to issue this statement in a classroom and receive nodding heads in response, but it is quite a different situation when those students become purchasing managers themselves and are faced with the choice of paying more money up front under VMI or picking the lowest bid from any competitive supplier of reasonable quality and reputation. Typical business measures put in place to influence purchasing employees' behavior create negative incentives for employing VMI, since paying more money for supplies yields concrete negative numbers, even if the organization as a whole sees a cost reduction that is hidden in other areas of the organization. Conversely, measurements usually create incentives for purchasing managers to pick the lowest bid, even if the company as a whole loses. This project, based on an ongoing study of the electric-utility industry, seeks to construct a solution for communicating the economic realities of separately sourcing materials for manufacturing versus creating a lasting relationship with one primary supplier through VMI. Moreover, the project will attempt to create an "argument" that arms students with knowledge of "total cost of ownership" philosophies, so that they can approach future manufacturing sourcing decisions with clear and convincing "experiential" knowledge. The result will be a clearly-defined economic difference between sourcing methodologies, complete with specific methods of quantifying (in terms of money) many of the benefits of VMI that impact the bottom line, but are not easily converted to a dollar figure.
机译:供应商管理的库存(VMI)是制造商的一个伟大的福音 - 当巧妙地实施 - 因为它们提供较低的库存,降低总体成本,众多风险管理优势,以及改善的服务水平。已经采用VMI的远见制造商参见成本节省的成本和服务改进,相信每个产品发票上显示的较大美元数字。正如通常在教育中,在课堂上发布这一陈述并以回应点头接受点头,但是当这些学生自己自己购买管理者并面临前面的选择时,这是完全不同的情况在VMI下或从任何合理质量和声誉的竞争供应商那里挑选最低的出价。落实到位,影响采购员工行为的典型业务措施造成负面的激励采用VMI,因为付出更多的钱用品产量混凝土负数,即使组织作为一个整体看是隐藏在组织中的其他领域降低成本。相反,测量通常会为购买经理创造激励,即使公司作为整体丢失,也是如此。该项目基于电效用行业的正在进行的研究,旨在构建一个解决方案,以便为制造而沟通分别采购材料的经济现实,通过VMI与一个主要供应商创造持久的关系。此外,该项目将试图创建一个“论证”,该武器学生了解“总体拥有成本”哲学,使他们可以通过清晰和令人信服的“经验”知识来接近未来的制造采购决策。结果将是采购方法的明确定义的经济差异,完整的特定方法量化(根据金钱而言)VMI影响底线的许多好处,但不容易转换为一美元的数字。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号