首页> 外文会议>International conference on energy sustainability >THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND GREEN OPEN SPACES IN LEED-ND AND CHINESE URBAN PLANNING STANDARDS
【24h】

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND GREEN OPEN SPACES IN LEED-ND AND CHINESE URBAN PLANNING STANDARDS

机译:LEED-ND和中国城市规划标准紧凑型开发与绿色开放空间的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

On the basis of a green neighborhood development project in Changsha, this paper, studies the disparities between compact development and green (vegetated) open space issues in LEED-ND and the following Chinese national and local urban planning standards: 1.Changsha City Technical Regulations on Urban Planning (CSCTRUP) 2.China Code of Urban Residential Areas Planning and Design (CURAPD) 3.Evaluation Standard for Green Building (ESGB) The author found LEED-ND scoring method in compact development and green open space suitable for Chinese urban redevelopment, however, the point's scale in Neighborhood Pattern and Design (NPD) Credit 2: Compact Development and NPD Credit 9: Access to Civic and Public Space, cannot reflect Chinese urban reality. A set of alternative scoring approaches have been proposed to improve LEED-ND's adaptability in China. Similarly, the green (vegetated) open space requirements are studied and technical suggestions are provided to adapt LEED-ND in China.
机译:本文在长沙的绿色街区开发项目的基础上,研究了LEED-ND和以下中国国家和当地城市规划标准的紧凑开发和绿色(植被)开放空间问题的差异:1.Changsha市技术法规在城市规划(CSCTRUP)2.中国城市住宅区规划和设计(CURAPD)的守则。绿色建筑评价标准(ESGB),作者在紧凑的开发和绿色开放空间中找到了LEED-ND评分方法,适用于中国城市重建然而,邻里模式和设计(NPD)信用的点规模:紧凑的开发和NPD信贷9:访问公民和公共空间,无法反映中国城市现实。已经提出了一系列替代评分方法来提高LEED-ND在中国的适应性。同样,研究了绿色(植被)开放空间要求,并提供了技术建议,以适应中国的LEED-ND。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号