首页> 外文会议>ES2011;International conference on energy sustainability >THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND GREEN OPEN SPACES IN LEED-ND AND CHINESE URBAN PLANNING STANDARDS
【24h】

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND GREEN OPEN SPACES IN LEED-ND AND CHINESE URBAN PLANNING STANDARDS

机译:LEED-ND和中国城市规划标准的紧凑发展与绿色开放空间的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

On the basis of a green neighborhood development project in Changsha, this paper, studies the disparities between compact development and green (vegetated) open space issues in LEED-ND and the following Chinese national and local urban planning standards: 1.Changsha City Technical Regulations on Urban Planning (CSCTRUP) 2.China Code of Urban Residential Areas Planning and Design (CURAPD) 3.Evaluation Standard for Green Building (ESGB) The author found LEED-ND scoring method in compact development and green open space suitable for Chinese urban redevelopment, however, the point's scale in Neighborhood Pattern and Design (NPD) Credit 2: Compact Development and NPD Credit 9: Access to Civic and Public Space, cannot reflect Chinese urban reality. A set of alternative scoring approaches have been proposed to improve LEED-ND's adaptability in China. Similarly, the green (vegetated) open space requirements are studied and technical suggestions are provided to adapt LEED-ND in China.
机译:本文基于长沙市的绿色社区发展项目,研究了LEED-ND中紧凑型开发与绿色(植被)开放空间问题以及以下中国国家和地方城市规划标准之间的差异:1.长沙市技术法规城市规划(CSCTRUP)2.中国城市居住区规划与设计规范(CURAPD)3.绿色建筑评估标准(ESGB)作者发现紧凑型开发和绿色开放空间中的LEED-ND评分方法适用于中国城市重建但是,邻里模式和设计(NPD)信用2:紧凑型开发和NPD信用9:获得公民和公共空间的要点规模无法反映中国的城市现实。为了提高LEED-ND在中国的适应性,已提出了一系列替代评分方法。同样,研究了绿色(植被)开放空间要求,并提供了技术建议以适应中国的LEED-ND。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号