首页> 外文会议>NACE Corrosion Conference and Expo >Direct Comparison of Microbial Population Analysis Using ATP Quantification, Culture Based Enumeration in Bug Bottles, Epifluorescence Microscopy and Shotgun Population Analysis by Sequencing 16S Amplicons
【24h】

Direct Comparison of Microbial Population Analysis Using ATP Quantification, Culture Based Enumeration in Bug Bottles, Epifluorescence Microscopy and Shotgun Population Analysis by Sequencing 16S Amplicons

机译:通过测序16S扩增子通过ATP定量,培养基于培养物的抑制,培养基于培养物的抑制,对虫瓶,离荧光显微镜和霰弹枪种群分析进行直接比较

获取原文

摘要

Monitoring of microbial populations in oil and gas operations is routinely conducted in order to evaluate the need for and performance of biocides. Operators utilize a variety of methods designed to determine if bacteria and archaea capable of causing corrosion, fouling, or souring are present in the systems before, during, and after control methods are applied. Each monitoring method has strengths and limitations, and an understanding of the strengths and limitations is crucial to deciding the best method for any given system. The most obvious considerations are the accuracy of the test, cost, ease of use, and time required to obtain the results. How comparable results are from a given location or time to another time, and the value of the data for making higher-level decisions also should be considered. In this study, we will share the results obtained from analyzing samples collected from various phases of natural gas and oil production operations. These locations include microbial populations collected from a range of operating temperatures, pressures and salinities as well as those treated with different types of biocides. Four methods, culture based enumeration using bug bottles with indicator media for sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and acid-producing bacteria (APB), rapid bacterial cell enumeration based on an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) quantification assay, epifluorescence microscopy, and molecular analysis of the microbial populations by DNA isolation and sequencing of 16S amplicons were directly compared. The results are discussed in terms of agreement between the methods, difficulty of the approaches, and the relative value of each data set for future use.
机译:常规进行对石油和气体操作的微生物种群的监测,以评估杀生物剂的需要和性能。操作员利用各种方法,该方法旨在确定能够在系统之前,期间和在控制方法的系统中存在腐蚀,污垢或溶解的细菌和沉淀。每个监测方法具有强度和局限性,并且了解强度和限制对于确定任何给定系统的最佳方法是至关重要的。最明显的考虑是测试,成本,易用性和获得结果所需时间的准确性。如何从给定位置或时间到另一个时间的比较如何,也应考虑制作更高级别决策的数据的值。在这项研究中,我们将分享从分析从天然气和石油生产操作的各个阶段收集的样品获得的结果。这些位置包括从一系列工作温度,压力和盐度收集的微生物群以及用不同类型的杀生物剂处理的那些。四种方法,培养基于毒品瓶的抑制用指示剂介质用于硫酸盐还原细菌(SRB)和产生酸性细菌(APB),基于腺苷三磷酸(ATP)定量测定,离荧光显微镜和分子分析的快速细菌细胞计量通过DNA分离和16S扩增子测序的微生物群进行比较。结果是在方法之间的协议,方法的难度和未来使用的每个数据集的相对值之间讨论的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号