首页> 外文会议>Materials Science Technology Conference and Exhibition >Key disciplines Lab. of light alloy processing science and technology,Nanchang Hangkong University, 330063, P.R. of China
【24h】

Key disciplines Lab. of light alloy processing science and technology,Nanchang Hangkong University, 330063, P.R. of China

机译:重点学科实验室。作者:王莹,南昌HANGKONG UNILONIONION南昌杭康大学轻质合金加工科学及科技

获取原文

摘要

The high computational cost of simulating friction stir welding (FSW) demands an appropriate level of accuracy, focused on a specific class of results; thus, different models are designed to precisely model certain aspects of the process. The present work reviews modeling programs currently used for simulating FSW, assessing and comparing the capabilities of each. Five well-established models were compared based on literature describing each, and scored on their ability to predict material and heat flow, microstructure evolution, welding forces, and residual stresses with reasonable computational cost. Each model was found to be well-suited for simulating specific facets of the FSW process. For instance, the CEMEF and Schmidt models have the unique advantage of modeling movement of free surfaces to predict void formation, while the DeBroy model requires a comparatively small computational cost. When properly weighted, the scores provide an objective method for comparing models, choosing one for a given application.
机译:模拟摩擦搅拌焊接(FSW)的高计算成本要求适当的精度水平,专注于特定的结果;因此,不同的模型旨在精确地模拟该过程的某些方面。目前的工作评论目前用于模拟FSW的建模程序,评估和比较各自的功能。基于描述各自的文献,比较了五种良好的模型,并在其预测材料和热流量,微观流量,焊接力和具有合理的计算成本的剩余应力的能力进行了比较。发现每个模型都非常适合模拟FSW过程的特定方面。例如,CEMEF和Schmidt模型具有自由表面的运动建模以预测空隙形成的独特优势,而德布鲁模型需要相对小的计算成本。当正确加权时,分数提供了一种用于比较模型的客观方法,为特定应用选择一个。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号