首页> 外文会议>Oceans Conference >Are All Floating Structures Vessels? An Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Holding in Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company
【24h】

Are All Floating Structures Vessels? An Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Holding in Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company

机译:都是浮动结构血管吗?美国最高法院举行斯图尔特诉司令部的分析.Dutra建筑公司

获取原文

摘要

On February 22, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company, held that a dredge is a "vessel" under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (LHWCA). While the dredge in question had only limited means of self-propulsion, the Supreme Court found that it was "practically capable of maritime transportation." The Court's new test for determining vessel status expands the range of floating structures that can be considered vessels under the LHWCA and the Jones Act. This paper will discuss the impact of the Supreme Court's decision and subsequent lower court rulings on offshore operations.
机译:2005年2月22日,美国最高法院,在斯图尔特诉Dutra建筑公司,据龙岸和港口工人赔偿法(LHWCA)举行了疏浚。虽然有关的疏浚只是有限的自我推进手段,但最高法院发现它是“实际上能够进行海运运输”。法院的确定船舶状态的新测试扩大了浮动结构的范围,这些结构可以被视为LHWCA和JONES法案下的船只。本文将讨论最高法院决定和随后的较低法院裁决对海上行动的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号