首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Progress toward Lofty Goals: A Meta-synthesis of the State of Research on K-12 Engineering Education (Fundamental)
【24h】

Progress toward Lofty Goals: A Meta-synthesis of the State of Research on K-12 Engineering Education (Fundamental)

机译:崇高目标的进展情况:K-12工程教育研究状态的荟萃合成(基础)

获取原文

摘要

This paper synthesizes literature on formal and informal engineering education in K-12 settings. We focus on outcomes related to (1) developing interest and/or identities in engineering, including in (2) engineering careers, (3) recruitment of increased numbers of students, (4) learning and achievement of science, technology, and mathematics content/practices, (5) learning and achievement of engineering content/practices, (6) understanding the nature of engineering, and (7) broadening participation of diverse learners. Employing the methodology of previous reviews [1-4], we reviewed papers published between 2008-2016 (n = 131 papers). We used Google Scholar and a set of search terms including synonyms for K-12 settings, informal settings, and engineering education, to identify relevant peer reviewed journal articles. We coded each paper based on goals, data, analysis, and outcomes achieved. We then synthesized findings and gaps from previous reviews and the 2008-2016 time period. We find that in the past eight years the field has developed increasingly rigorous research methods, but many publications still report studies that have not adopted this higher level of rigor. There are still opportunities for growth tied to qualitative methods in particular. Further, there are still few published studies that contribute in meaningful ways to our understanding of how to recruit and retain learners from diverse groups. We close by setting research agendas and avenues needed to understand and impact concerns over diversity and inclusion in engineering.
机译:本文在K-12环境中综合了正式和非正式工程教育的文献。我们专注于与(1)工程中的兴趣和/或身份相关的结果,包括(2)工程职业,(3)招募增加的学生数量,(4)学习和实现科学,技术和数学含量/练习,(5)学习和实现工程内容/实践,(6)了解工程的性质,(7)扩大不同学习者的参与。采用前一篇评论的方法[1-4],我们审查了2008 - 2016年期间发布的论文(n = 131篇论文)。我们使用谷歌学者和一系列搜索条件,包括K-12设置,非正式设置和工程教育的同义词,以识别相关的同行评审期刊文章。我们根据实现的目标,数据,分析和结果编码了每份纸张。然后,我们从之前的评论和2008-2016时间段合成了调查结果和空白。我们发现,在过去的八年里,该领域已经发展了越来越严谨的研究方法,但许多出版物仍然报告了尚未采用这种更高水平的严格的研究。仍有机会尤其与定性方法联系在一起。此外,仍有很少的公布研究,以有意义的方式为如何从不同的群体招募和保留学习者的理解而有意义的方式。我们通过设定研究议程和途径,了解和影响多样性和纳入工程的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号