首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >The Impact of Community College Students' Propensity for Innovation on Persistence in STEM Majors
【24h】

The Impact of Community College Students' Propensity for Innovation on Persistence in STEM Majors

机译:社区大学生创新倾向对阀杆专业持久性的影响

获取原文

摘要

There is a critical need for more students with engineering and science majors to enter into, persist, and graduate from postsecondary institutions. Increasing the diversity in engineering and science is also a profound identified need. According to national statistics, the largest groups of underrepresented minority students in engineering and science attend United States public higher education institutions and in particular the community colleges. Recent research has indicated that students from these populations who are strong problem solvers, and who understand how to seek assistance and navigate college campuses, are most likely persist to degree completion. Accordingly, this research examined a sample of non-traditional college students enrolled in science and engineering programs in four urban community colleges to determine (a) the types and frequency of support practices they utilized, (b) how such practices influenced their achievement, persistence and transfer status to four-year colleges and universities, and (c) how in turn their propensity for innovation and creative problem solving affected such choices and persistence. The study analyzed the impact of pedagogical support practices-practices designed to foster successful transfer from community college to four-year colleges and universities, and how students' innovative capability affected such transfer capacity. The goals were: (a) to understand whether particular pedagogical support practices were effective in offering non-traditional students a program that enabled them to remain in engineering and science majors and to transfer to a four-year college or university, and (b) to determine if students' propensity for innovative problem solving influenced use of pedagogical practices and ultimately, transfer persistence. The research targeted four research questions: (1) What are the patterns of pedagogical practices that community colleges employ to enhance students' transfer success in engineering and science? (2) How do students' creative and innovative problem solving approaches influence the choices that they make in using pedagogical support practices? (3) What are the impacts of pedagogical practices and differences among pedagogical practices, on persistence toward students' transfer to colleges and universities? (4) How do students' creative and innovative problem solving approaches influence their persistence toward transfer to engineering and science programs at four-year universities? This research involves a two-stage study in which in stage one, the types of pedagogical support practices used in community colleges were analyzed and taxonomized. Results of this part of research led to the delineation and refining of three categories of pedagogical support: (1) College attending support, (2) Program planning and execution support, and (3) Classroom and program performance support. These categories led to development and refinement of a college level pedagogical practice taxonomy and inventory which was used in stage two of the research in which data was collected on 2476 community college students in STEM majors. The intent of stage two of the research is to determine the role of students' creativity and propensity of innovation had on their persistence and the impact that use of particular pedagogical practices had on their persistence, creativity and propensity for innovation in STEM. Two structural equation models (SEMs) have been developed for data analyses with one containing grade point average (as a proxy for achievement) as the outcome of interest and the second with engineering creativity and propensity for innovation as the outcome of interest. These two models indicate that use of pedagogical practices impact students' creativity and propensity for innovation and propensity for innovation impacts students' achievement (with GPA as a proxy.) Notably, background characteristics also have impacts on the two outcomes of interest. This research
机译:对于更多有工程和科学专业的学生进入,持续和毕业,致力于从后期机构毕业。增加工程和科学的多样性也是一个深刻的确定需要。据国家统计数据称,工程与科学中最大的少数民族少数民族学生群体参加美国公立高等教育机构,特别是社区学院。最近的研究表明,来自这些人口的学生是强大的问题求解者,并了解如何寻求援助和航行学院校区,最有可能持续学历。因此,该研究审查了一家非传统大学生样本,其中四所城市社区学院注册了科学和工程方案,以确定他们所使用的支持实践的类型和频率,(b)这些做法如何影响其成就,持久性并转移到四年大学和大学,(c)如何转动其创新和创造性问题的倾向,并解决这些选择和持久性。该研究分析了教学支持措施的影响,旨在促进社区学院成功转移到四年高校,以及学生的创新能力如何影响这种转移能力。目标是:(a)了解特定的教学支持实践是否有效地为非传统学生提供一个使他们留在工程和科学专业的计划,并转移到一名四年大学,以及(B)确定学生是否对创新问题的倾向解,解决了教学实践的利用,最终,转移持久性。该研究有针对性化了四个研究问题:(1)社区学院员工在工程和科学方面取得成功的教学实践的模式是什么? (2)学生的创造性和创新问题如何解决方法影响他们使用教学支持实践所做的选择? (3)教学实践与教学实践之间的差异的影响是什么,以持续到学生转移到高校的持久性? (4)学生的创造性和创新问题解决方法如何在四年大学转移到工程和科学计划的持久性?本研究涉及两阶段的研究,其中在第一阶段,分析了社区学院的教学支持实践的类型和分类。这部分研究结果导致了三类教学支持的描绘和精炼:(1)学院主持支持,(2)方案规划和执行支持,(3)课堂和计划绩效支持。这些类别导致了大学级教学实践的发展和改进了分类和库存,其中两项研究中使用了两项研究的研究,其中在杆杆专业的2476名社区大学生收集了数据。研究阶段的第两项研究的目的是确定学生的创造力和创新倾向的作用,因为他们的持久性以及使用特定教学实践的影响对他们的持久性,创造力和茎的创新倾向。已经开发了两个结构方程模型(SEM),用于数据分析,其中包含一个含有的等级点平均值(作为成就代理)作为感兴趣的结果和具有工程创造性的第二个结果和创新倾向作为感兴趣的结果。这两种模型表明,使用教学实践影响学生的创造力和创新的倾向和创新的倾向影响学生的成就(GPA作为代理。),背景特征也对两个感兴趣的结果产生影响。这项研究

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号