首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Examining Relationships and Patterns in Pedagogical Beliefs, Attitudes and Classroom Practices for Faculty of Undergraduate Engineering, Math and Science Foundational Courses
【24h】

Examining Relationships and Patterns in Pedagogical Beliefs, Attitudes and Classroom Practices for Faculty of Undergraduate Engineering, Math and Science Foundational Courses

机译:检查本科工程,数学和科学基础课程教师的教学信仰,态度和课堂实践的关系和模式

获取原文

摘要

The beliefs and practices of 21 faculty engaged in the STEM instruction of freshmen engineering students were examined in this study. Specifically, the degree to which faculty beliefs conformed to a Student-centered approach versus a Teacher-centered approach, and the degree to which these orientations were related to learner-centered classroom practice, was assessed. Four data collection methods were employed: faculty interviews, faculty surveys, observation protocol scores and qualitative classroom observations. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of faculty responses to the Approaches to Teaching Inventory revealed three coherent groups of faculty who held common beliefs: Faculty who displayed Student-centered beliefs, faculty who displayed Teacher-centered beliefs, and faculty who displayed non-discriminatory beliefs. These beliefs corresponded closely to assessment of their classroom practice. Student-centered faculty engaged in more learner centered practices than either Teacher-centered faculty or non-discriminating faculty. Results showed that the Freshman Engineering departments and the Mathematics department had the most within-department consistency in their teaching delivery and environment. Instruction delivery ranged from mostly lecture with pauses for questions in one of the physics classes, to shared problem solving in one of the mathematics classes, to student led activities in engineering. Student interactions with each other during class ranged from very little, particularly in the large lecture halls, to almost constant collaboration in classes with laboratory formats. Implications for faculty development for the improvement of freshman engineering programs are discussed.
机译:本研究审查了从事新生工程学生茎教学的21名教师的信仰和做法。具体地,教师信仰符合学生中心的方法与教师以教师为中心的方法,以及这些方向与以学习者为中心的课堂实践相关的程度进行了评估。采用四种数据收集方法:教师面试,教师调查,观察协议分数和定性课堂观测。教职工的反应到的教学方法库存聚类分析显示,教师三个连贯组谁持有共同的信念:教师谁显示以学生为中心的信念,教师谁显示以教师为中心的信念和教师谁显示非歧视性的信仰。这些信念与评估课堂实践进行了密切相关。以学生为中心的学生从事比教师为中心的教师或非歧视教师的更多学习者的实践。结果表明,新生工程部门和数学部门在其教学交付和环境中具有最多的内部一致性。教学交付主要从大多数讲座,其中一个物理课程中的问题,在其中一个数学课程中进行分享问题,以学生在工程中的led活动中解决。学生在阶级期间互相互动,尤其是在大型讲座中,在实验室格式的课堂上几乎不断持续。讨论了对新生工程方案改善的教师发展的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号