首页> 外文会议>International symposium on integrated water resources management >Urban stormwater source control policies: why and how?
【24h】

Urban stormwater source control policies: why and how?

机译:城市雨水源控制政策:为什么和如何?

获取原文

摘要

Stormwater source control is becoming a common strategy for urban stormwater management in many countries. It relies on regulations or other policy instruments compelling or inciting implementation, for each new urban development, of small-scale facilities to locally store and manage stormwater. Local authorities that pioneered source control since the 1980s have already observed that small-scale facilities systematically implemented over a catchment are able to influence its hydrological behaviour. This capability is the main strength of source control, as it allows compensation for the negative effects of urbanization. Yet, it also represents its main risk: if initial decision-making is not sufficiently accurate, source control can produce long-term negative effects. Because of its current spreading, source control will acquire an increasing role as a driver of hydrological changes in urban catchments, and the directions of these changes depend on current policy-making practices. This paper presents an analysis and a critical discussion of the main objectives that policy-makers attribute to stormwater source control. The investigation is based on a sample of French case studies, completed by a literature review for international comparison. It identifies four main objectives, some typical of urban stormwater management and some more innovative: flood reduction, receiving waters protection, sustainable development, costs reduction. The discussion focuses on how current policy-making practices are able to translate these objectives in concrete policy instruments, and on which knowledge and tools could improve this process. It is shown that for some objectives, basic knowledge is available, but the creation of policy instruments which are effective at the catchment scale and adapted to local conditions is still problematic. For other objectives, substantial lacks of knowledge exist, casting doubts on long-term effectiveness of current policy instruments. Research directions are identified to improve source control policies and thus the future hydrologic behaviour of many urban catchments.
机译:雨水源控制正在成为许多国家城市雨水管理的共同战略。它依赖于迫切或煽动实施的法规或其他政策工具,为每个新的城市开发,小型设施到局部商店和管理雨水。自20世纪80年代以来的地方当局已经观察到自20世纪80年代以来的开创性的来源控制,系统地在集水区系统实施的小规模设施能够影响其水文行为。这种能力是源控制的主要优势,因为它允许补偿城市化的负面影响。然而,它还代表其主要风险:如果初始决策不够准确,源控制可能会产生长期负面影响。由于其目前的传播,源控制将获得越来越多的角色作为城市集水区水文变化的驱动力,这些变化的方向取决于当前的政策制定实践。本文提出了对策略制造者归因于雨水源控制的主要目标的分析和批判性讨论。该调查基于法国案例研究样本,由国际比较的文献审查完成。它确定了四个主要目标,一些典型的城市雨水管理和一些更具创新性:减少洪水,接受水域保护,可持续发展,减少成本。讨论侧重于当前的政策制定实践如何能够在具体的政策工具中翻译这些目标,以及哪些知识和工具可以改善这一过程。结果表明,对于某些目标,基本知识可用,但在集水区规模上有效并适应当地条件的政策文书的创建仍然存在问题。为了其他目的,存在大量缺乏知识,对当前政策工具的长期有效性造成疑虑。确定了研究方向,以改善源控制政策,从而确定许多城市集水区的未来水文行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号