【24h】

Urban stormwater source control policies: why and how?

机译:城市雨水源控制政策:为什么以及如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Stormwater source control is becoming a common strategy for urban stormwater management in many countries. It relies on regulations or other policy instruments compelling or inciting implementation, for each new urban development, of small-scale facilities to locally store and manage stormwater. Local authorities that pioneered source control since the 1980s have already observed that small-scale facilities systematically implemented over a catchment are able to influence its hydrological behaviour. This capability is the main strength of source control, as it allows compensation for the negative effects of urbanization. Yet, it also represents its main risk: if initial decision-making is not sufficiently accurate, source control can produce long-term negative effects. Because of its current spreading, source control will acquire an increasing role as a driver of hydrological changes in urban catchments, and the directions of these changes depend on current policy-making practices. This paper presents an analysis and a critical discussion of the main objectives that policy-makers attribute to stormwater source control. The investigation is based on a sample of French case studies, completed by a literature review for international comparison. It identifies four main objectives, some typical of urban stormwater management and some more innovative: flood reduction, receiving waters protection, sustainable development, costs reduction. The discussion focuses on how current policy-making practices are able to translate these objectives in concrete policy instruments, and on which knowledge and tools could improve this process. It is shown that for some objectives, basic knowledge is available, but the creation of policy instruments which are effective at the catchment scale and adapted to local conditions is still problematic. For other objectives, substantial lacks of knowledge exist, casting doubts on long-term effectiveness of current policy instruments. Research directions are identified to improve source control policies and thus the future hydrologic behaviour of many urban catchments.
机译:雨水源控制已成为许多国家城市雨水管理的普遍策略。对于每个新的城市发展,它都依赖于法规或其他政策手段来强制或鼓励实施小型设施,以在当地存储和管理雨水。自1980年代以来率先进行水源控制的地方当局已经观察到,在流域系统地实施的小型设施能够影响其水文行为。此功能是源代码控制的主要优势,因为它可以补偿城市化的负面影响。然而,这也代表了其主要风险:如果最初的决策不够准确,源头控制会产生长期的负面影响。由于其当前的传播,源头控制将在推动城市集水区水文变化方面起越来越重要的作用,而这些变化的方向取决于当前的决策方法。本文对决策者归因于雨水源控制的主要目标进行了分析和批判性讨论。该调查基于法国案例研究的样本,并通过文献综述进行了国际比较。它确定了四个主要目标,其中一些是城市雨水管理的典型特征,而另一些则更具创新性:减少洪水,保护水域,可持续发展,降低成本。讨论的重点是当前的决策实践如何能够将这些目标转化为具体的政策工具,以及哪些知识和工具可以改善这一过程。结果表明,对于某些目标而言,基础知识是可用的,但是创建在流域范围内有效并适应当地条件的政策工具仍然存在问题。对于其他目标,仍然严重缺乏知识,这使人们对当前政策工具的长期有效性产生怀疑。确定研究方向以改善水源控制政策,从而改善许多城市集水区的未来水文行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号