首页> 外文会议>Joint ASME/JSME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference >A Comparison of the Simplified Eiastic-Piastic Strain Concentration Factors, K{sub}e, of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code with Experimental and Analytical Results
【24h】

A Comparison of the Simplified Eiastic-Piastic Strain Concentration Factors, K{sub}e, of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code with Experimental and Analytical Results

机译:基于实验和分析结果的ASME锅炉和压力容器码的简化EIASTIC-PIATIC菌株因子,K {SUB} e的比较

获取原文

摘要

Low alloy steel laboratory test specimens of two different configurations were cyclically loaded to linearized stress ranges exceeding twice the material yield strength, 2Sy. Strain distributions in the specimens were monitored with strain gages and were correlated with the results of elastic and elastic-plastic finite element analyses. A comparison of the elastic-plastic strain concentration factors determined in this study with the K{sub}e factors specified by the NB-3228.5 simplified elastic-plastic analysis procedure showed the following: (1) At linearized stress ranges exceeding 2Sy, the elastic-plastic strain concentration for both tested configurations fall below the Code K{sub}e factors. (2) Effects of elastic-plastic strain concentration are noted at stress ranges below twice the material yield strength, i.e., at stress ranges where the Code does not specify use of an elastic-plastic strain concentration factor. The significance of the above findings is reviewed relative to potential changes to the Code simplified elastic-plastic analysis procedure.
机译:低合金钢实验室试样两种不同的配置循环地装载到线性化应力范围超过材料产量强度的两倍,2。用应变计监测标本中的应变分布,并与弹性和弹塑性有限元分析的结果相关。本研究中测定的弹性塑性应变浓度因子与NB-3228.5简化弹塑性分析程序规定的k {sub} e因子进行了比较:(1)在线化压力范围超过2sy,弹性两个测试配置的塑性应变浓度低于代码k {sub} E因子。 (2)弹性塑料应变浓度的影响在低于材料屈服强度的两倍的应力范围内,即,在应力范围内,所述代码不指定使用弹性塑性应变浓度因子。相对于代码简化弹塑性分析程序的潜在变化,对上述研究结果进行了意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号