首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1023)TOWARDS THE INTEGRATION OF SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TO PROBLEM RESOLUTION SKILLS IN THE ENGINEERING AREA: A CASE STUDYTOWARDS THE INTEGRATION OF SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TO PROBLEM RESOLUTION SKILLS IN THE ENGINEERING AREA: A CASE STUDY
【24h】

(1023)TOWARDS THE INTEGRATION OF SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TO PROBLEM RESOLUTION SKILLS IN THE ENGINEERING AREA: A CASE STUDYTOWARDS THE INTEGRATION OF SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TO PROBLEM RESOLUTION SKILLS IN THE ENGINEERING AREA: A CASE STUDY

机译:(1023)在工程领域的问题解决技能纳入总结和形成性评估:以案例研究 在工程建议中纳入总结和形成性评估对问题解决方案的结合:案例研究

获取原文

摘要

The European Higher Education Framework makes mandatory the teaching of practical skills touniversity students at all competence levels. This implies a review of the traditional teachingmethodologies and the adoption of active ones where the student plays the main role in the teachinglearningprocess. This methodology allows students to develop their own skills and makes themconscious of their knowledge about a specific topic.As it is well known, problem resolution skills in Engineering are traditionally developed by taking notesfrom already solved problems in books or by the academic staff. We have found several weaknessesin this approach: first of all, it results a passive methodology where the average student is not reallyconscious about his own progress or his skills for solving similar problems. Moreover, we have noticedthat even if the student is able to solve a proposed problem, it is used that he finds difficulties toexplain clearly what he has done and why. This means that, although the student has achieved theobjective of struggling with certain kind of problems, he has not developed the desired skills.In this work we present a case study where we integrate a summative and formative assessment anda Problem Based Learning method to a second year Electrical Engineering students group. Theapplied methodology can be summarized as presenting the students not the procedure to solve aparticular kind of problems but a generalized strategy. Then, they have to collaborate in groups tosolve a never seen before exercise and explain it to their partners. A specific rating scale has beendeveloped to evaluate all involved skills. This way we are able to carry on a detailed competencesassessment. We found that students achieved to solve the proposed problems successfully, they wereable to suggest new ones and their motivation and general knowledge improved significantly.
机译:欧洲高等教育框架制造了所有能力水平的实用技能教学。这意味着对传统教学方法的审查以及通过学生在教学中的主要作用中的积极作用的审查。这种方法允许学生制定自己的技能,并使他们的知识成为特定主题的知识。它是众所周知的,通过在书籍或学术工作人员中已经解决的问题或由学术人员在书籍或学术人员中已经解决了问题而开发了工程中的问题解决技巧。我们发现了几种弱点这种方法:首先,它会导致被动方法,普通学生对自己的进步或他解决类似问题的技能并不是真的。此外,我们已经注意到了,即使学生能够解决拟议的问题,它也被用来清楚地发现他所做的事情以及为什么发现困难。这意味着,虽然学生已经达到了某种问题的斗争,但他没有制定所需的技能。在这项工作我们提出了一个案例研究,我们将基于总统和形成的学习方法整合到一秒钟年电气工程学生组。可以概述第应用的方法,因为提出了学生而不是解决了一个概念的程序,而是一般性的策略。然后,他们必须在锻炼前从未见过的托苏举行,并向他们的合作伙伴解释一组。特定的评级规模已经开始,以评估所有涉及的技能。这样我们就可以进行详细的竞争科学。我们发现学生成功地解决了拟议的问题,他们与建议新的问题和他们的动机和一般知识显着提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号