首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1372) THE EUROPEANISATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES - A LITERATURE REVIEW
【24h】

(1372) THE EUROPEANISATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES - A LITERATURE REVIEW

机译:(1372)科学技术政策欧洲化 - 文献综述

获取原文

摘要

The so-called knowledge society and knowledge economy can be interpreted as a meta-narrative or as a governance tool to accomplish European integration. Chronological analyses of the emergence of knowledge society/economy as a governance tool remit us to the Lisbon Council and to the subsequent creation of the European Research Area (ERA) at the level of the scientific research system. Science and innovation policies in the European context are defined as a way to foster European integration around the idea of competitiveness [1]. Although this issue has been addressed in the literature, there are still some doubts on what the phenomena of Europeanisation of Science and Innovation means and how it is identified and interpreted. This paper aims to fill this gap by presenting the results of a systematic literature review, showing how the literature approaches the Europeanisation of science and technology, what are the main themes that are being addressed and, more importantly, which are the disciplinary areas or scientific fields that sustain the analysis. The most popular sources for bibliometric data at present are: Thomson Reuters Web of Science (WoS), Elsevier’s Scopus, and Google Scholar. As only the first two restrict their coverage to peerreviewed- only material and to avoid potential bias the research was carried out using the Elsevier’s Scopus database. Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and it contains the most important journals in terms of our research topic (namely it indexes 50% more journals in the social sciences than WoS). Moreover, Scopus tends to cover less traditional topics, such as Europeanisation, as well as more interdisciplinary publications [2], [3]. Having defined the goals of the research, we searched for the combined expressions ‘Europeanisation’, ‘European Research Area’, ‘Science, Technology and Innovation’ and ‘Policy’ in articles on the subject areas of “social sciences” and “business, management and accounting”. The literature was analyzed by distinguishing the main issues discussed. Europeanisation is commonly associated with the way national science and technology policies converge or diverge within European guidelines. Four main themes or topics immediately emerge in the literature: ERA Framework, Convergence of the National Research Systems, Collaboration and Research Networks, International Mobility and Universities’ Mission. The theoretical background used in the discussion of the topics is mainly focused on political science and management theories. To our knowledge, this is an innovative study in the field, considering that although it is possible to find some systematic literature review on knowledge society, the same does not hold true for Europeanisation and science and technology policies.
机译:所谓的知识社会和知识经济可以被解释为元叙述或作为实现欧洲整合的治理工具。作为治理工具的知识社会/经济出现的时间分析汇往里斯本委员会,并随后在科研体系水平上提出了欧洲研究区(时代)。欧洲背景下的科学和创新政策被定义为一种促进欧洲终结围绕竞争力的融合[1]。虽然这个问题已经在文献中得到了解决,但仍有一些疑问,关于欧洲化科学和创新意味着的现象以及如何确定和解释。本文旨在通过提出系统文献综述的结果,展示文学如何旨在涉及欧洲化科学和技术的结果,是如何解决的主要主题,更重要的是,这是纪律领域或科学维持分析的领域。目前最受欢迎的Bibliometric数据来源是:Thomson Reuters Science(WOS),elessvier的Scopus和Google学者。仅作为前两个将其覆盖范围限制为仅限PEERREVIEDED-PEREMITET,并且避免使用ELSEVIER的SCOPUS数据库进行研究。 Scopus是同行评审文献中最大的抽象和引文数据库,它包含了我们的研究主题方面最重要的期刊(即它在社会科学中的期刊比WOS中的50%更多)。此外,Scopus倾向于涵盖较少的传统主题,例如欧洲化,以及更多跨学科出版物[2],[3]。确定了研究的目标,我们搜索了“欧洲化”,“欧洲研究区”,“科学,技术和创新”和“政策”在“社会科学”和“业务”,管理和会计“。通过区分讨论的主要问题来分析文献。欧洲化通常与国家科学和技术政策在欧洲准则中融合或分歧的方式相关。在文献中出现了四个主要主题或主题:ERA框架,国家研究系统,协作和研究网络,国际流动和大学的使命。在讨论主题的理论背景主要集中在政治科学和管理理论上。为了我们的知识,这是该领域的创新研究,虽然可以找到关于知识社会的一些系统文献综述,但欧洲化和科技政策也不存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号