首页> 外文会议>SouthCHI 2013 >A. Holzinger et al. (Eds.): SouthCHI 2013, LNCS 7946, pp. 711-720, 2013. ? Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Reading on eInk and Backlit LED - The Influence of Positive and Negative Contrast on Eye Movements
【24h】

A. Holzinger et al. (Eds.): SouthCHI 2013, LNCS 7946, pp. 711-720, 2013. ? Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Reading on eInk and Backlit LED - The Influence of Positive and Negative Contrast on Eye Movements

机译:A. Holzinger等。 (EDS。):2013年Southchi 2013,LNCS 7946,PP。711-720,2013。? Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013年阅读exink和backlit LED - 积极和负面对比对眼球运动的影响

获取原文

摘要

This preliminary study aims at identifying possible differences in eye movements while reading either dark text on light background or light text on dark background on-screen. To this end, eye movements during reading with two different screen technologies which are dominant in the domain of mobile e-reading devices (i.e. eInk and backlit LED), have been examined for both negative and positive contrast. Results show that for reading on electronic displays, direction of contrast (negative/positive) has no significant influence on central eye movements involved in reading. Therefore, both positive and negative contrasts can be recommended when presenting text to users on-screen and provide good readability. This goes for either eInk or LED screens, however, a tendency for longer fixations was observed when reading with negative contrast on the LED screen. This may be due to the higher contrast on the LED screen, compared to the lower contrast of the eInk screen.
机译:这项初步研究旨在识别眼球运动的可能差异,同时阅读在屏幕上的黑暗的背景上的浅色背景或浅色文本的黑暗文本。为此,通过在移动电子阅读设备域(即ePink和Backlit LED)中的两个不同屏幕技术进行读取期间的眼球运动,已经检查了负面和正对比度。结果表明,对于电子显示屏进行阅读,对比度(负/阳性)对读取中的中眼动作没有显着影响。因此,在屏幕上向用户呈现并提供良好的可读性时,可以建议正负对比度。然而,这对于eICK或LED屏幕来说,当用LED屏幕上的负对比时,观察到更长固定的趋势。这可能是由于LED屏幕上的对比度较高,而与exink屏幕的较低对比度相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号