首页> 外文会议>Aunual Mary Kay O Connor Process Safety Center International Symposium >Prescriptive Safety Regulation vs. Safety Case Regulation: Is there a best solution to safety today?
【24h】

Prescriptive Safety Regulation vs. Safety Case Regulation: Is there a best solution to safety today?

机译:处方安全监管和。安全案例规则:今天有安全的安全解决方案吗?

获取原文

摘要

In the wake of the Chevron Refinery Explosion, the Chemical Safety Board has proposed a safety case regulatory approach as an alternative to the current more prescriptive approach used in the US today. Process safety management (PSM) arose in 1990 in the form of OSHA 1910.119 following the Piper Alpha & Bhopal catastrophic incidents. Process safety management has provided a safety structure within the United States with its 14 elements that have been the epicenter of safety for all applicable facilities. Prescriptive safety regulation involves providing specific quantitative requirements addressing safety considerations in design and operations. A safety case, on the other hand, requires a detailed analysis of hazards and steps taken to address those hazards, and thus minimize or mitigate the risk. These safety cases are then reviewed in detail by a well-trained regulator. Such an approach is used in the United Kingdom, Australia and Norway.
机译:在雪佛龙炼油厂爆炸之后,化学安全委员会提出了一种安全案例监管方法,作为当今美国使用的目前更规范性的方法的替代方案。过程安全管理(PSM)于1990年以OSHA 1910.119之后的形式出现,吹笛者alpha和博巴尔灾难性事件之后。过程安全管理在美国提供了安全结构,其中14个元素已成为所有适用设施的安全震中。规定性安全监管涉及提供特定的定量要求,解决设计和运营中的安全考虑因素。另一方面,安全案例需要详细分析以解决这些危害所采取的危险和步骤,从而最大限度地减少或减轻风险。然后通过训练有素的调节器详细审查这些安全案例。这种方法在英国,澳大利亚和挪威使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号