首页> 外文会议>Aunual Mary Kay O Connor Process Safety Center International Symposium >Lean Risk Management: Are We Identifying Risks Accurately? Step Back and Realize Opportunities to Improve the Management of Your Risks
【24h】

Lean Risk Management: Are We Identifying Risks Accurately? Step Back and Realize Opportunities to Improve the Management of Your Risks

机译:精益风险管理:我们是否准确地识别风险?退后一步,实现改善风险管理的机会

获取原文

摘要

In this mad world of risk management the general direction of business process flow has been with a "full speed ahead and no time to look back" attitude. This is normally the case, from the authors' experience in the oil and gas industry, during the aftermath of major incidents such as the Alexander Kielland, Ocean Ranger, Piper Alpha and now Montara & Macondo. After the dust has settled now is the right time to step back and review our risk management plans and objectives by starting our review at the initial risk or hazard identification and flowing through to the risk management execution. The identification of the risk/hazard is the most critical aspect of any effective risk management plan. The objective of this paper is to utilize the lessons learned during the review of hazard/risk identification, analysis and assessment performed during life-cycle of an oil and gas industry field development and to demonstrate where to focus effort in improving the effectiveness, by removing unnecessary activities, of the risk management process. This approach utilizes Lean thinking (the flow of the process), the principles of Plan Do Check Act and Theory of Constraints (TOC) (system improvement focus) logic-driven approach to improve and enhance the risk management process. The current industry constraint of qualified and experienced risk management manpower and the demands of new regulations such as the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement BOEMRE SEMP (Safety and Environmental Program) has meant that the Exploration and Production E&P Industry has to be more focused on finding methodologies that will effectively focus on the risks and remove any unnecessary testing, costs or other wasteful activities during the application of the risk management process. Examples such as utilizing the concept of bow ties or cause & effect trees to help understand, identify, and better address corrosion, materials performance and mechanical integrity issues that may occur or be predicted will be presented. The use of this hybrid quality approach has provided the impetus or motivation in enhancing how we perform risk or hazard management in the E&P industry.
机译:在这个风险管理的疯狂世界中,业务流程的总体方向一直以“全速前进,没有时间回顾”态度。这通常是这种情况,从提交人的石油和天然气行业的经验,在亚历山大·凯兰,海洋游侠,吹笛者alpha和现在蒙塔拉和麦丹多的主要事件之后。灰尘结算后,现在是返回和审查我们的风险管理计划和目标,通过在初始风险或危险识别和流动到风险管理执行中来审查我们的风险管理计划和目标。风险/危害的识别是任何有效风险管理计划的最关键方面。本文的目的是利用在石油和天然气行业领域发展的生命周期内进行危害/风险识别,分析和评估期间了解的经验教训,并通过去除,展示努力提高效力的地方风险管理过程的不必要的活动。这种方法利用精益思想(流程的流程),计划的原则确实检查行为和限制理论(TOC)(系统改善焦点)逻辑驱动的方法,提高和增强风险管理过程。有资格和经验丰富的风险管理人力的当前行业限制以及新的法规等新法规,如海洋能源管理,监管和执法展位(安全和环境方案),这意味着勘探和生产E&P行业必须更多专注于发现将有效地关注风险的方法,并在应用风险管理过程中消除任何不必要的测试,成本或其他浪费活动。诸如利用弓形关系的概念或导致和效果树的示例,以帮助理解,识别和更好的地址腐蚀,将呈现或预测的材料性能和机械完整性问题。这种混合质量方法的使用提供了推动或动机,在加强我们在E&P行业的风险或危险管理方面提供了动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号