首页> 外文会议>International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium >ASSESSING THE AFTERCARE DURATION AT A LANDFILL: THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND PRACTICAL ISSUES
【24h】

ASSESSING THE AFTERCARE DURATION AT A LANDFILL: THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND PRACTICAL ISSUES

机译:评估垃圾填埋场的后续持续时间:理论考虑和实际问题

获取原文

摘要

The EU Landfill Directive (1999/31/EC) requires (in Article 13 c)) that “after a landfill has been definitely closed, the operator shall be responsible for its maintenance, monitoring and control in the after-care phase for as long as may be required by the competent authority, taking into account the time during which the landfill could present hazards.” In Article 10 of the Landfill Directive Member States are required to ensure that financial security is in place to include the cost of the after-care of a closed landfill site for a period of “at least 30 years”. Despite the formulation, it has become customary for many landfill operators e.g. in Denmark to use 30 years of after-care as a default condition when calculating the gate fees for acceptance of waste at a landfill. This means that if the aftercare period exceeds 30 years (which for many landfills seems likely), maintenance, monitoring and control is still the responsibility of the operator, but the financial security may be insufficient to cover the costs associated with the extension of the aftercare period. This problem could be anticipated and possibly remedied if a reasonably accurate estimate could be made of the aftercare period for a given landfill. However, in order to assess the duration of the aftercare period for a landfill, it is necessary to determine the conditions under which “the competent authorities [no longer] consider the landfill likely to cause a hazard to the environment” (Article 12 d) in the Landfill Directive). The Landfill Directive does not provide any specific guidance on how to determine that the landfill has reached a stage where the active management associated with the after-care period can be discontinued and the landfill can be “left on its own” with only passive environmental protection systems in place. Estimating the duration of the aftercare period for a landfill is at best an extremely difficult task, and if the goal to be reached is not known, it becomes virtually impossible. In general, the exact criteria to be met are likely to be site-specific and depend on the type of landfill in question and on vulnerability of the surrounding environment.
机译:欧盟垃圾填埋指令(1999/31 / EC)要求(第13章第13章))即“垃圾填埋场肯定关闭后,运营商应负责其在龙头后阶段的维护,监测和控制由于主管当局可能需要,考虑到垃圾填埋场可能出现危险的时间。“在“垃圾纳纳指令”第10条中,需要确保财务安全就业,包括封闭式垃圾填埋场后的成本,以便“至少30年”。尽管制定了,但许多垃圾填埋场运营商已经习惯了。在计算垃圾填埋场接受废物的门票时,在丹麦使用30年后的后护理作为默认条件。这意味着如果后续期限超过30年(对于许多垃圾填埋场似乎可能),维护,监测和控制仍然是运营商的责任,但金融安全可能不足以支付与追加后延期相关的成本时期。如果可合理准确的估计可以对给定垃圾填埋场的后续期限进行合理准确的估计,则可以预期这个问题。但是,为了评估垃圾填埋场的后期后期的持续时间,有必要确定“主管当局[不再]考虑垃圾填埋场可能导致环境造成危害的条件”(第12章)在垃圾填埋指令中)。垃圾填埋指令没有提供有关如何确定垃圾填埋场达到的阶段的任何具体指导,其中可以停止与洗手间时期相关的积极管理,并且只有被动环保,垃圾填埋场可以“留下自己”系统到位。估计垃圾填埋场的后续时期的持续时间是最好的一项非常艰巨的任务,如果要达到的目标是不知道的,那么它几乎不可能。通常,要满足的确切标准可能是特定于现场的,并且依赖于有关的垃圾填埋场和周围环境的脆弱性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号