首页> 外文会议>IEEE Annual Frontiers in Education Conference >Engineering management education post GFC and copenhagen: Are we on the right track?
【24h】

Engineering management education post GFC and copenhagen: Are we on the right track?

机译:工程管理教育岗位GFC和哥本哈根:我们是否在正确的轨道上?

获取原文

摘要

As world leaders around the globe navigate around the global financial crisis (GFC) and climate change agendas, aspiring engineering and engineering educators must rethink the enabling pathways for the personal, professional and educational development of professional engineering managers. A call for reform has exhibited in the early 21st century in form of numerous reports and literature around the globe. However, a revisit may now be required to ensure that the recommendations remain valid in the education of the next generation of engineering managers. The paper looks to the latest literature to review the findings of those pre GFC reports and highlights some of the existing engineering management and leadership programs around the world. It comments on the adequacy of those programs post GFC and provides a clearer picture of the key components and pathways of an aspiring engineering manager's learning journey. The issues that educators need address within course and program design are identified and discussed.
机译:由于全球领导者环绕着全球金融危机(GFC)和气候变化议程,有吸引力的工程和工程教育者必须重新思考专业工程管理人员个人,专业和教育发展的有利途径。在21世纪初,在全球众多报告和文学形式上展出了改革。但是,现在需要重新审视以确保建议在下一代工程管理人员中仍然有效。该论文旨在审查最新文献,审查这些Pre GFC报告的调查结果,并突出了世界各地现有的现有工程管理和领导方案。它评论了GFC邮政的这些计划的充分性,并提供了更清晰的抱负工程经理学习旅程的关键组件和通路的图片。教育工作者在课程和方案设计内需要地址的问题并讨论并讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号