首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose >Electronic Nose and Use of Bags to Collect Odorous Air Samples in Meat Quality Analysis
【24h】

Electronic Nose and Use of Bags to Collect Odorous Air Samples in Meat Quality Analysis

机译:电子鼻子和使用袋子在肉质分析中收集有臭氧的空气样本

获取原文

摘要

To test EN reliability and use of bags on meat, 17 bulls (one group of 9 and one of 8) fed similarly, except for a supplementary feedingstuff, were used. Samples were prepared according to the MCS protocol and repeated three times on different days for a total of 51 samples. Bags were used to collect raw and cooked meat air samples, and to test odour changes among samples analysed at different times. The first time analysis was performed immediately after collection then was repeated ,1 hour, 1 day and 1 week later. The Electronic Nose is very discriminant and clear differences were evident among raw, cooked and bags odorous profiles. The highest values were found in cooked samples and the broad range class (W5S) was the most representative. The EN also recognized the two tested feed treatments. In the cooked samples, all sensor responses decrease while time enhances, indicating a progressive chemical variation of the air composition in the bag, with a less correlation shown in the raw samples. When using bags, to avoid bias, is important to fix analysis in order to obtain useful results.
机译:为了在肉类上进行可靠性和使用袋子,使用17公牛(一组9和8个)类似,除了补充饲料外,喂食。根据MCS方案制备样品,并在不同天中重复三次,总共51个样品。袋子用于收集原料和煮熟的肉类空气样本,并在不同时间分析的样品中测试气味变化。第一次分析在收集后立即进行,然后重复,1小时,1天和1周后。电子鼻子是非常判别的,并且在原始,煮熟和袋子的曲线中显而易见的差异。在煮熟的样品中发现了最高值,并且广泛的范围类(W5S)是最具代表性的。 EN还认识到这两个测试的饲料处理。在烹饪的样品中,所有传感器响应在时间增强时降低,表示袋中空气组合物的渐进化学变化,并在原始样品中显示的相关性较小。使用袋子时,要避免偏见,对于修复分析非常重要,以获得有用的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号