首页> 外文会议>International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality >Requirement Ambiguity Not as Important as Expected - Results of an Empirical Evaluation
【24h】

Requirement Ambiguity Not as Important as Expected - Results of an Empirical Evaluation

机译:要求歧义与预期的不那么重要 - 实证评估结果

获取原文

摘要

[Context and motivation] Requirement ambiguity is seen as an important factor for project success. However, empirical data about this relation are limited. [Question/problem] We analyze how ambiguous requirements relate to the success of software projects. [Principal ideas/results] Three methods are used to study the relation between requirement ambiguity and project success. First, data about requirements and project outcome were collected for 40 industrial projects. We find that, based on a correlation analysis, that the level of ambiguity in the requirements for a project does not correlate with the project's success. Second, using a root-cause analysis, we observe that ambiguity does not cause more defects during the test phase. Third, expert interviews were conducted to validate these results. This resulted in a framework that outlines factors influencing requirement-ambiguity risk. [Contribution] Empirical data are presented about the relationship between requirement ambiguity and project success. A framework is created to describe nine factors that increase or mitigate requirement-ambiguity risk.
机译:[背景和动机]要求歧义被视为项目成功的重要因素。然而,关于该关系的经验数据是有限的。 [问题/问题]我们分析了软件项目的成功有何模棱两可的要求。 [主要思想/结果]三种方法用于研究需求歧义与项目成功之间的关系。首先,为40个工业项目收集了有关要求和项目结果的数据。我们发现,基于相关分析,项目要求的歧义水平与项目的成功无关。其次,使用根本原因分析,我们观察到歧义在测试阶段期间不会引起更多缺陷。第三,进行专家访谈以验证这些结果。这导致了一个框架,概述了影响要求 - 模糊性风险的因素。 [贡献]呈现实证数据关于要求歧义与项目成功之间的关系。创建一个框架,以描述增加或减轻需求 - 歧义风险的九个因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号