首页> 外文会议>International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality >Validation of the Effectiveness of an Optimized EPMcreate as an Aid for Creative Requirements Elicitation
【24h】

Validation of the Effectiveness of an Optimized EPMcreate as an Aid for Creative Requirements Elicitation

机译:验证优化的EPMCREATE作为创造性要求引出的援助的有效性

获取原文

摘要

[Context and Motivation] Creativity is often needed in requirements elicitation, and techniques to enhance creativity are believed to be useful. [Question/Problem] This paper describes a controlled experiment to compare the requirements-elicitation effectiveness of three creativity enhancement techniques: (1) full EPMcreate; (2) Power-Only EPMcreate, an optimization of full EPMcreate; (3) traditional brainstorming. [Principal ideas/Results] Each technique was used by teams of students each of which applied its technique to generate ideas for requirements for enhancing a high school's public Web site. [Contribution] The results of this first experiment indicate that Power-Only EPMcreate is more effective, by the quantity and quality of the ideas generated, than full EPMcreate, which is, in turn, more effective than brainstorming.
机译:[上下文和动机]在要求中经常需要创造力,并且据信来提高创造力的技术是有用的。 [问题/问题]本文介绍了一个受控实验,以比较三种创造性增强技术的需求诱导效果:(1)全EpMcreate; (2)仅电力EPMCREATE,优化全EPMCREATE; (3)传统头脑风暴。 [主要思想/结果]每种技术都被学生的团队使用,每个技术都应用了其技术来为增强高中公共网站的要求生成思想。 [贡献]第一个实验的结果表明,仅由生成的思想的数量和质量依赖于完全Epmcreate的思想的数量和质量更有效,这比头脑风暴更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号