首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Travel Survey Methods >Instrument Design: Decisions and Procedures
【24h】

Instrument Design: Decisions and Procedures

机译:仪器设计:决策和程序

获取原文

摘要

While questionnaires must be custom-built to the specifications of given survey situations, there are guidelines that inform instrument design. Even so there are still unresolved issues and basic methodological questions about the instrument design process. A few issues are identified in this conclusion that stem from issues that arose previously in this chapter. While this chapter attempts to accommodate both self-administered and interviewer-mediated questionnaires, it is apparent that the task of questionnaire construction is very much tied to the survey mode. Furthermore, research issues related to questionnaire construction are also mode-specific. For example, with Internet surveys, researchers are attempting to understand principles that underlie visual processing of information, such as the effects of relative size, colour, brightness, or the location of information on questionnaire pages (Dillman, 2002). On the other hand, with CATI questionnaires, researchers are more concerned with interviewer performance, because it is a crucial part of the data quality (Czada and Blair, 1996). Researchers are focusing on how to reduce the level of interviewer effort. Future research should focus on identifying these mode-specific instrument problems and their potential solutions. This latter idea is important within the context of mixed-mode designs, and underlies the additional level of effort required for their application. The instrument designer needs to be aware of the decisions and problems associated with each individual mode and to design instruments accordingly. Ensuring the conceptual equivalence of the mixed-mode instruments is challenging at best. Also, empirical research needs to be done on evaluating the potential mode affects specific to personal travel surveys and their impact on data quality.
机译:虽然调查问卷必须定制到给定调查情况的规范,但有向仪器设计提供指导方针。即便如此,仍然存在未解决的问题和关于仪器设计过程的基本方法论问题。在这一结论中确定了一些问题,这些问题源于本章前面产生的问题。虽然本章试图适应自我管理和面试官中介的问卷,但显然是调查问卷建设的任务与调查模式有很大联系。此外,与调查问卷结构相关的研究问题也是特定于模式的。例如,通过互联网调查,研究人员试图了解基本的原则,即信息的视觉处理,例如相对大小,颜色,亮度或问卷网上信息的位置(Dillman,2002)的影响。另一方面,随着CATI问卷调查表,研究人员更关注面试官的表现,因为它是数据质量的关键部分(Czada和Blair,1996)。研究人员专注于如何降低面试官努力的水平。未来的研究应该侧重于确定这些特定模式的仪器问题及其潜在的解决方案。后一种想法在混合模式设计的背景下很重要,并为其申请所需的额外工作水平提升。仪器设计者需要了解与每个单独模式相关的决策和问题,并相应地设计仪器。确保混合模式仪器的概念等值充其量挑战。此外,需要对评估特定于个人旅行调查的潜在模式以及对数据质量的影响来进行实证研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号