首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies >TOWARDS A METHODOLOGY FOR TOP SEAL EFFICACY ASSESSMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CO_2 STORAGE
【24h】

TOWARDS A METHODOLOGY FOR TOP SEAL EFFICACY ASSESSMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CO_2 STORAGE

机译:朝着地下CO_2储存的顶级密封功效评估的方法

获取原文

摘要

Quantitative assessment of leakage risk and leakage rates from planned underground CO_2 storage sites is a primary requirement for public acceptance, formal site approval, and credit for stored CO_2 quantities under CO_2 emission schedules. Leakage through the top seal can basically occur by three processes: (ⅰ) diffusion through the pore system, (ⅱ) capillary transport through the pore system of the seal, (ⅲ) multiphase migration through a (micro-) fracture network; or by a combination of any of these. Diffusion results in very low leakage rates; maximum rates typically attained after several 100 000 years, being in the ppm range. Multiphase capillary migration is characterized by two main parameters: capillary breakthrough pressure and effective permeability to the non-wetting phase (CO_2). The dependence of effective permeability to CO_2 on capillary pressure, which in turn is a function of CO_2 column height, is hysteretic in character with generally higher effective permeability during pressure decrease (column shrinkage) than during increase, at the same capillary pressure (CO_2 column height). Leakage is likely to stop at approximately 20 to 50% of the breakthrough pressure as suggested by the 'snap-off' theory by Vassenden et al. (2003). Capillary breakthrough pressure and effective permeability is very difficult to measure for low-permeable rocks. A recently presented method by Hildenbrand et al. (2002) shows promising results, but their data require cautious re-interpretation prior to application to CO_2-storage cases. Time-delay effects may imply that their 'maximum effective permeability' at laboratory conditions is not the maximum attainable in nature and in CO_2 storage reservoirs. Their 'minimum capillary displacement pressure' may rather be a 'snap-off pressure than a breakthrough pressure, the latter being higher by a factor of 2 to 5. Detection and prediction of the presence of microfractures, which have much larger permeability than the rock matrix, is difficult. Simulation techniques can, however, be used to estimate the likelihood for their generation by burial-induced overpressure. In general, prediction of fluid-flow parameters for the seal to CO_2 storage sites is a challenge due to the probable low data coverage. Reliable extrapolation of such parameters from punctual data at wells across the space above the whole storage site requires considerable improvements of the understanding of depositional processes of fine-grained rocks.
机译:计划地下CO_2存储站点的泄漏风险和泄漏率的定量评估是CO_2排放时间表下存放CO_2数量的公共验收,正式现场批准和信用的主要要求。通过顶部密封的泄漏可以基本上发生三个过程:(Ⅰ)通过孔系统扩散,(Ⅱ)通过孔系统的密封孔系统,(Ⅲ)多相迁移通过(微量)裂缝网络;或者通过任何内容的组合。扩散导致极低的泄漏速率;最大速率通常在几万000年后达到,处于PPM范围内。多相毛细血管迁移的特征在于两个主要参数:毛细血管突破压力和对非润湿相的有效渗透率(CO_2)。有效渗透性对Co_2对Co_2柱高的函数的依赖性,其特征在于在相同的毛细管压力下的压力下降(柱收缩)期间具有普遍较高的有效渗透性的迟滞(柱收缩)(CO_2柱)高度)。泄漏可能会在大约20到50%的突破压力下停止,这是“扑克关闭”理论由Vassenden等人建议的。 (2003)。毛细管突破压力和有效渗透性对于低渗岩石来说是非常困难的。 Hildenbrand等人最近呈现的方法。 (2002)显示了有希望的结果,但他们的数据在申请到CO_2储存案件之前需要谨慎重新解释。时间延误效应可能意味着他们在实验室条件下的“最大有效渗透率”并不是自然和CO_2储存储存器中可达到的最大值。它们的“最小毛细管位移压力”可能是“比突破性压力的快速压力”,后者更高,倍数为2至5.检测和预测微磨损的存在,这具有比岩石更大的渗透性矩阵,很难。然而,可以使用仿真技术来估计他们通过埋葬的过压这一生成的可能性。通常,由于可能的低数据覆盖率,对CO_2存储站点的密封的流体流动参数的预测是挑战。在整个存储场地上方的空间上的井中的准时数据中的可靠外推到井上的井中需要大量改进细粒岩石的沉积过程的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号