首页> 外文会议>International Compressor Engineering Conference at Purdue >Parallel vs. Serial Noise Suppression Method for Positive Displacement (PD) Compressors Internal Combustion Engines (ICE)
【24h】

Parallel vs. Serial Noise Suppression Method for Positive Displacement (PD) Compressors Internal Combustion Engines (ICE)

机译:正排量(PD)压缩机和内燃机(ICE)的平行与串行噪声抑制方法

获取原文

摘要

Positive displacement (PD) compressors and internal combustion engines (ICEs) are major energy consumers. For example, a typical US household may have as many as 7 compressors (2 in house AC, 2 in auto AC, 1 each for refrigerator or freezer or shop compressed air, refer to Soedel-2007) and 4 ICEs (2 in auto, 1 each for lawn mower and auxiliary power generator). Both technologies generate high amplitude pulsating pressures1 (up to 180-200 dB) and fluctuating discharge flows that demand a silencer or muffler to suppress noise but leads to high energy costs: up to 5-7% shaft power for PD compressors and up to 2-5% gasoline or diesel consumption for ICEs. Growing global demand for higher efficiency and lower noise for these systems is conflicting with the governing rule of serial muffling (Daniel, 2005) employed for the past 100 years: “More Noise Reduction, More Back Pressure Losses or Use Larger Size or Multiple Mufflers”. No current technology could meet both demands simultaneously due to the limitation of the current serial noise suppression methodology.
机译:正排量(PD)压缩机和内燃机(ICE)是主要能源消费者。例如,典型的美国家庭可能拥有多达7个压缩机(2在房屋AC中,2中的2个用于冰箱或冰箱或冰箱或商店压缩空气的1个,参见Soedel-2007)和4秒(2在汽车中, 1每个用于割草机和辅助发电机)。两种技术都产生高幅度脉动压力1(高达180-200 dB),并且波动的放电流量要求消音器或消声器抑制噪声,而导致高能量成本:PD压缩机高达5-7%的轴功率,最多2 -5%汽油或柴油消耗冰。由于过去100年的串行消声(Daniel,2005)的治理规则,增加全球对更高效率和降低噪声的需求正在与持续100年的串行消声(Daniel,2005)进行冲突:“减少降噪,更多的背压损失或使用更大的尺寸或多个消声器” 。由于当前串行噪声抑制方法的限制,没有电流技术可以同时满足两种需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号