首页> 外文会议>Association for Information Systems Americas conference on information systems >AN INVESTIGATION OF THE MOTIVATORS AND EFFECTS OF FORMALIZED KNOWLEDGE SHARING AT THE WORKPLACE: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH
【24h】

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE MOTIVATORS AND EFFECTS OF FORMALIZED KNOWLEDGE SHARING AT THE WORKPLACE: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH

机译:在工作场所进行正式知识共享的激励因子和影响:一种定性方法

获取原文

摘要

Current empirical research and organizational efforts have revealed the significance in comprehending and promoting knowledge management (KM) and the knowledge sharing that ensues from it (Brown & Duguid, 1991; Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; Leidner, 1998; Prusak, 2000; Alavi & Leidner, 2001). Knowledge sharing has been identified as a key enabler of KM and can be viewed as the interactive, people-to-people dissemination of knowledge between and among individuals and groups (Davenport, 1998). In fact, information sharing within organizations has been implemented for several years now, especially enabled by the concepts of total quality management and the new organization (Drucker, 1988). In Geus and Senge (1997), Senge succinctly highlights the notion and importance of sharing knowledge in enabling a rich and fulfilling work life. Yet, little empirical research has actually been conducted on knowledge sharing, particularly from the viewpoint of the individuals who share knowledge and the environments and mechanisms that are conducive to formalized knowledge sharing. A formalized setting is one where the knowledge sharing does not occur through serendipity (e.g., water cooler conversations) or through personal networks. Rather, an employee seeking information utilizes a formal organizational tool or process such as a community of practice, training session, mentoring, or rotation to enable knowledge sharing. The crux of this study is to understand a crucial human behavior within the work environment – the knowledge sharing behavior (KSB). In trying to understand this behavior, it is important to investigate what motivates it and what its effects are on the person displaying the behavior. One would expect that “sharers” perceive tangible and intangible effects from the KSB’s they display. Bandura’s (1977) Social Learning Theory (SLT) provides a framework that explains human behavior in terms of the tangible/intangible effects it produces. In the KM context, SLT helps explains KSB’s through the continuous interaction between the person, his environment, and the behavior. It posits that response consequences (e.g., enhanced personal knowledgebase, gratification, bonuses) affect the chance that an individual will display a KSB again in a given situation. Further, these response consequences of the behavior are instrumental in the individual forming expectations of the outcomes of their behavior. Using this theory, this study investigates the perceived cognitive (I.e., how it affects one’s personal knowledgebase), affective (I.e., how it affects one’s feelings), social (I.e., how it affects one’s social work life), and tangible effects (e.g., monetary rewards or enhancement of tools) of formalized knowledge sharing on the sharer. Using a multi-case-study approach, data were gathered via 60 in-depth interviews conducted at two fortune 500 companies. A typical interview began with a short introduction to the expectations and goals of the study. The respondent was then asked to describe a knowledge sharing experience he/she had (as the sharer) that stood out in his/her mind as being positive. Next, motivators of the particular knowledge sharing experience described were elicited. Then, “effects on the sharer” were elicited along two major themes: perceived cognitive/affective effects of knowledge sharing and perceived social/tangible effects of knowledge sharing. For the affective effects question, a pre-determined list of potential feelings was provided to the respondent with the option of adding feelings that were absent on the list. All of the remaining questions were completely open-ended. Several probes for depth, clarity and completeness were conducted throughout the interview. The respondent was then asked to describe a knowledge sharing experience that stood out in his/her mind as being negative (if one had occurred). Questions were then asked to elicit the motivators and effects of the negative knowledge sharing experience and these
机译:目前的经验研究和组织努力已经揭示了理解和促进知识管理(KM)的重要性以及从中有所了解的知识分摊(Brown&Duguid,1991,1991; Leidner,1998; Prusak,2000; Alavi&莱德纳,2001年)。知识共享已被确定为KM的关键推动者,可以被视为个人和团体之间的知识的互动,人们传播(Davenport,1998)。事实上,组织内的信息共享已经实施了几年,特别是由全面质量管理和新组织的概念(Drucker,1988)所启用。在Geus和Senge(1997)中,Senge简洁地突出了分享知识的概念和重要性,使富裕和实现工作生活。然而,实际上已经在知识共享中进行了很少的实证研究,特别是从分享知识和有利于正式化知识共享的环境和机制的个人的观点来看。正式的设置是通过Serencipity(例如,水冷却器对话)或通过个人网络发​​生知识共享的设置。相反,员工寻求信息利用正式的组织工具或过程,例如练习社区,培训,指导或轮换,以实现知识共享。本研究的症状是了解工作环境中的至关重要的人类行为 - 知识共享行为(KSB)。在试图了解这种行为时,重要的是要调查哪些激励它以及其效果对显示行为的人。人们会期望“分享者”从KSB展示中感知有形和无形的影响。 Bandura的(1977)社会学习理论(SLT)提供了一个框架,以便在它产生的有形/无形效果方面解释人类行为。在KM上下文中,SLT帮助KSB通过人,环境和行为之间的持续互动解释。它假设响应后果(例如,增强的个人知识库,满足,奖金)影响个人将在给定情况下再次显示KSB的可能性。此外,这些行为的响应后果在个人形成了其行为结果的期望中。使用这个理论,本研究调查了感知认知(即,它如何影响一个人的个人知识库),情感(即它如何影响一个人的感受),社会(即,它如何影响一个人的社会工作生活)和有形影响(例如在分号上的正式知识共享的货币奖励或增强工具)。使用多案例研究方法,通过在两个财富500强公司进行的60个深入访谈收集数据。典型的采访开始介绍了该研究的期望和目标。被访者被要求描述他/她的知识共享体验(作为分享者)在他/她的思想中呈现出积极的态度。接下来,引发了所描述的特定知识共享经验的动机。然后,沿两项主要主题引发“对分店的影响”:感知知识共享的认知/情感影响和知识共享的社会/切实影响。对于情感效果问题,向被访者提供了预先确定的潜在感受列表,并选择在列表中缺席的感情。所有剩余的问题都是完全开放的。在整个面试中进行了几个深度,清晰度和完整性的探讨。然后被要求描述一个知识共享经验,这些经验在他/她的思想中脱掉负面(如果发生了一个)。然后要求问题引发潮汐知识共享经验的励志和影响

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号