首页> 外文会议>Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop >Ebbinghaus illusion: questioning the role of conceptual similarity
【24h】

Ebbinghaus illusion: questioning the role of conceptual similarity

机译:Ebbinghaus幻觉:质疑概念相似性的作用

获取原文

摘要

The effect of social categorisation on optical illusions such as the Ebbinghaus illusion is an example of how social categorisalion impinges on perceptual treatment of stimuli. The widespread explanation for this illusion relies on size contrast theory. Nevertheless, Stapel & Koomen's studies [28] have shown that increasing conceptual or social category similarity between central and surrounding elements enhances the illusion, suggesting that the perceptual processes involved occur at a later stage of processing. This effect diverges from a prediction based on Self Categorisat ion Theory, according to which increasing social category similarity decreases the illusion, since differences between elements belonging to the same category are minimised. We conceptually replicated Stapel & Koomen's study. Our results show an inverse pattern to theirs: while obtaining an illusion in all conditions, the illusion increased when category similarity decreased. Within a SCT perspective, we propose an explanation for the difference between these diverging results based on the social nature of the stimuli.
机译:社会分类对诸如Ebbinghaus幻觉之类的光学幻觉的影响是社会分类如何影响刺激的感知治疗。这种错觉的广泛解释依赖于尺寸对比度。尽管如此,Stapel&Komen的研究表明,中央和周围元素之间的概念或社会类别相似度增强了幻觉,表明所涉及的感知过程发生在后来的处理阶段。这种效果从基于自我分类的离子理论的预测发散,根据哪种升高的社会类别相似度降低了错觉,因为属于相同类别的元素之间的差异是最小化的。我们在概念上复制Stapel和Koomen的研究。我们的结果显示了它们的逆模式:在获得所有条件下获得幻觉的同时,当类别相似性降低时,幻觉增加。在SCT的角度下,我们提出了对基于刺激的社会性质的这些发散结果之间的差异的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号