首页> 外文会议>Mexican Symposium on Medical Physics >Importance of HDR Source Calibration and Measurement
【24h】

Importance of HDR Source Calibration and Measurement

机译:HDR源校准和测量的重要性

获取原文

摘要

The most common radionucide used in High-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is ~(192)Ir and has been used clinically for over 25 years. The first calibration of this source was performed at the University of Wisconsin - Madison. Other HDR sources are beginning to be introduced into the market, each of which requires a unique calibration. One of these sources is electronic brachytherapy (eBT). The calibration of these sources involves the use of different standards, namely a calibrated ion chamber traceable to a primary standards dosimetry laboratory such as NIST or a free-air chamber. The traceability of the ion chambers and the details of the free-air chamber will be described in detail. An uncertainty estimate for HDR sources (other source types are described elsewhere) will also be provided. [1] The University of Wisconsin has measured most HDR ~(192)Ir source models and found that the calibration coefficients for well-type ionization chambers agree to within ± 1 %, with a total uncertainty of 2.4%. For eBT sources, calibration coefficients derived from the University of Wisconsin free-air chamber agree with coefficients derived from the NIST standards to within ± 1 % as well. An estimate of the expanded uncertainty in each case will also be described. Comparison of the University of Wisconsin standard with other primary laboratories will also be presented, along with general characteristics of well-type ionization chambers. Calibration comparison data for several HDR ~(192)Ir sources has been demonstrated to agree within ± 1 %. [2] The agreement worldwide is also within this value. The 2.4 % uncertainty covers all of the various manufacturer sources and results in confidence in the calibration and measurement in the clinic using a well chamber. Electronic brachytherapy source calibrations will require a modification in the standard protocol as proposed by DeWerd et al. [3]. Clinical physicists can be assured that HDR ~(192)Ir calibrations traceable to primary standards dosimetry laboratories around the world are very similar and accurate.
机译:用于高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗的最常见的放射酰胺是〜(192)IR,并在临床上使用超过25年。该来源的第一次校准是在威斯康星大学 - 麦迪逊进行的。其他HDR来源开始被引入市场,每个人都需要独特的校准。其中一个来源是电子近距离放射治疗(EBT)。这些来源的校准涉及使用不同的标准,即校准的离子室可追溯到主要标准剂量测定实验室,例如NIST或自由空气室。将详细描述离子室的可追溯性和自由空气室的细节。还将提供对HDR来源的不确定性估计(其他源类型在其他地方描述)。 [1]威斯康星大学已经测量了大多数HDR〜(192)的IR源模型,发现良好型电离室的校准系数在±1%内,总不确定性为2.4%。对于EBT来源,威斯康星大学自由空气室衍生的校准系数同意从NIST标准衍生的系数也在±1%之内。还将描述对每个案例的扩展不确定性的估计。威斯康星大学标准与其他主要实验室的比较也将呈现,以及良好型电离室的一般特征。几个HDR〜(192)的校准比较数据已被证明在±1%内达成符合。 [2]全球协议也在该价值范围内。 2.4%的不确定性涵盖了所有各种制造商来源,并导致使用井室在诊所的校准和测量方面的置信度。电子近距离放射治疗源校准将需要修改Dewerd等人的标准协议。 [3]。临床物理学家可以放心,HDR〜(192)追溯到世界各地的主要标准剂量标准的IR校准非常相似和准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号