首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. 34th Annual >Work in progress-comparing assessment tools in computer science education: empirical analysis
【24h】

Work in progress-comparing assessment tools in computer science education: empirical analysis

机译:计算机科学教育中进度比较评估工具的工作:实证分析

获取原文

摘要

The paper discusses the usage of multiple-choice and open-ended constructed response questions for measuring the performance of undergraduate students in computer science courses. A goal of this research is to investigate if "guessing" plays a significant role in multiple-choice answering. An experiment was constructed in two academic institutions over a two-semester period involving students in four introductory programming classes. The quizzes consisted of pairs of similar questions, where each pair contained a multiple-choice and an open-ended constructed response question of equal difficulty and weight.
机译:本文讨论了使用选择题和开放式构造的回答问题来衡量计算机科学课程中大学生的表现的方法。这项研究的目的是调查“猜测”在多项选择答案中是否起重要作用。在两个学期的两个学术机构中进行了一项实验,有四个入门课程的学生参加。测验由成对的相似问题组成,其中每对都包含一个选择题和一个难度和重量相等的开放式构造的回答问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号