首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. 34th Annual >Work in progress - general engineering program assessment - where do we stand?
【24h】

Work in progress - general engineering program assessment - where do we stand?

机译:进行中的工作-一般工程计划评估-我们的立场是什么?

获取原文

摘要

Identifying and adopting suitable assessment methods are the beginning steps in planning for an accreditation process of a program. For a non-degree-granting department such as the General Engineering Department at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville, where do we begin? It is not a degree-granting department; rather it feeds students into the pipeline of the majors after they have completed the basic and core engineering science courses. Assessment requires and reflects a long-term commitment to the program and its constituencies, viz., the students, alumni and industry partners. Like most engineering programs, we have a long history of self-assessment and improvement. However, we had a little documentation of processes already in place. This paper is a discussion of possible assessment measures for departments such as ours and also raises questions about what more could be done.
机译:识别和采用合适的评估方法是规划程序的认证过程的开始步骤。对于威斯康星大学 - 普拉特维尔(Wisconsin-Plattereville大学的一般工程部)等非学位授予部门,我们从哪里开始?它不是一个学位授予部门;相反,它在完成基本和核心工程科学课程后,将学生送入专业的管道。评估要求并反映对该计划及其选区的长期承诺,即学生,校友和行业合作伙伴。与大多数工程计划一样,我们有一个悠久的自我评估和改进历史。但是,我们已经有一点文件已经到位了。本文讨论了诸如我们的各部门可能的评估措施,并提出了更多关于更重要的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号