首页> 外文会议>ASME power conference >THERMO-ECONOMIC ANALYSES AND COMPARISONS OF TWO S-CO_2-BRAYTON-CYCLE-BASED COMBINED POWER CYCLES FOR CONCENTRATED SOLAR POWER PLANTS
【24h】

THERMO-ECONOMIC ANALYSES AND COMPARISONS OF TWO S-CO_2-BRAYTON-CYCLE-BASED COMBINED POWER CYCLES FOR CONCENTRATED SOLAR POWER PLANTS

机译:集中式太阳能电厂中两种基于S-CO_2-布雷顿循环的组合功率循环的热经济分析及比较

获取原文

摘要

In order to pursue superior cycle efficiency and lower power generation cost for the CSP plants, two S-CO_2-Brayton-cycle-based power cycles with different utilization methods of the residual heat recover of the top S-CO_2 Brayton cycle (SCBC) are investigated to seek alternatives to the stand-alone S-CO_2 cycle as the power block of concentrated solar power plants. The residual heat released by the top S-CO_2 cycle are either utilized to drive a LiBr absorption chiller (AC) for further chilling of the CO_2 fluids exiting the precooler before entering the main compressor inlet temperature or recovered by an organic rankine cycle (ORC) for generating electricity. Thermo-economic analysis and optimization are performed for the SCBC-AC and SCBC-ORC, respectively. The results show that the thermal and exergetic efficiencies of the SCBC-AC are comparable with those of the SCBC-ORC in low pressure ratio conditions (PR<2.7) but are apparently lower than SCBC-ORC when PR is over 2.7. The LCOE of the CSP plant integrated with SCBC-AC is more sensitive to the change of PR. The optimal PR to maximum the cycle efficiency or minimize the plant LCOE for the SCBC-ORC is higher than that for the SCBC-AC, while the optimal recuperator effectiveness to minimize the LCOE of CSP plant integrated with SCBC-ORC is lower than that of SCBC-AC. The optimization results show that the thermo-economic performance of the SCBC-AC is comparable to that of the SCBC-ORC. Significant η_(ex) improvement and LCOE reduction can be obtained by both the two combined cycles relative to the stand-alone S-CO_2 cycle. The maximal η_(ex) improvements obtained by the SCBC-ORC and SCBC-AC are 6.83% and 4.12%, respectively. The maximal LCOE reduction obtained by the SCBC-ORC and SCBC-AC are 0.70¢/(kW·h) and 0.60¢/(kW·h), respectively.
机译:为了追求CSP工厂更高的循环效率和较低的发电成本,两个S-CO_2-布雷顿循环的功率循环具有不同的利用方法,用于回收顶部S-CO_2布雷顿循环(SCBC)的余热。进行了调查,以寻找独立的S-CO_2循环的替代方案,以作为集中式太阳能发电厂的动力装置。顶部S-CO_2循环释放的残余热量可用于驱动LiBr吸收式冷却器(AC),以进一步冷却离开预冷器的CO_2流体,然后进入主压缩机入口温度,或者通过有机朗肯循环(ORC)进行回收。用于发电。分别对SCBC-AC和SCBC-ORC进行热经济分析和优化。结果表明,在低压比条件下(PR <2.7),SCBC-AC的热效率和能量效率与SCBC-ORC相当,但当PR超过2.7时,其热效率和显效率明显低于SCBC-ORC。与SCBC-AC集成的CSP工厂的LCOE对PR的变化更为敏感。使SCBC-ORC达到最大化循环效率或最小化工厂LCOE的最佳PR高于SCBC-AC的最优PR,而使SCBC-ORC集成的CSP工厂的LCOE最小的最佳换热器效率却低于SCBC-ORC。 SCBC-AC。优化结果表明,SCBC-AC的热经济性能可与SCBC-ORC媲美。相对于独立的S-CO_2循环,两个联合循环均可获得显着的η_(ex)改善和LCOE降低。通过SCBC-ORC和SCBC-AC获得的最大η_(ex)改进分别为6.83%和4.12%。通过SCBC-ORC和SCBC-AC获得的最大LCOE降低分别为0.70 ¢ /(kW·h)和0.60 ¢ /(kW·h)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号