首页> 外文会议>World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering >Assessment of Interfraction Patient Setup for head-and-neck cancer Intensity modulated radiotherapy using multiple CT based image-guidance
【24h】

Assessment of Interfraction Patient Setup for head-and-neck cancer Intensity modulated radiotherapy using multiple CT based image-guidance

机译:使用基于多个CT的图像引导评估头颈部癌的分次患者设置强度调强放疗

获取原文

摘要

Purposes: Image-guided radiotherapy is routinely used in conjunction with head-and-neck (H&N) IMRT. The purpose of this work is to assess interfraction patient localization using KV cone beam CT (KVCBCT), MV cone beam CT (MVCBCT) and MV fan beam CT (MVCT) for H&N cancer radiation. Methods and Materials: Three CT-based IGRT modalities used for H&N IMRT were considered in this study: kV cone beam (Synergy, Elekta), MV cone beam (MVision, Siemens), and MV fan beam (TomoTherapy). The daily variations in me dialateral, craniocaudal and anteroposterior dimension were measured. The CTV-to-PTV margins were calculated using 2.0∑ +0.7σ, where ∑ and σ were systematic and random positioning errors, respectively. The influence of patient characteristics (i.e., weight, weight loss) on interfraction patient setup was also investigated. Results: A total of 3302 CT scans for 117 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Average inter-fraction displacements (±standard deviation) in the medialateral, craniocaudal and anteroposterior direction were 0.5±1.5, -0.3±2.0, 0.3±1.7 mm for KVCBCT, 0.2±1.9, -0.2±2.4 and 0.0±1.7 mm for MVCT and 0.0±1.8, 0.5±1.7 and 0.8±3.0 mm for MVCBCT. For MVCBCT, 30.2% of the patients had displacements greater than 3 mm in one translational direction, compared to 11.4% and 3.4% for MVCT and KVCBCT, respectively. On average, both systematic (in lateral and vertical direction) and random setup errors for MVCBCT were larger than KVCBCT and MVCT. Maximal uniform CTV-to-PTV margins were 3.0, 4.6 and 7.4 mm for KVCBCT, MVCT, and MVCBCT. No statistically significant difference of setup error with respect to translational direction was observed for the evaluated characteristics as well as during early, middle and late treatment courses. Conclusion: CTV-to-PTV margin in H&N IMRT may be a function of the imaging modality. These data indicate that larger uniform margins of 5 and 7 mm may be appropriate for MVCT and MVCBCT, respectively, compared to a smaller margin of 3 mm for KVCBCT.
机译:目的:影像引导放疗通常与头颈(H&N)IMRT结合使用。这项工作的目的是使用KV锥形束CT(KVCBCT),MV锥形束CT(MVCBCT)和MV扇形束CT(MVCT)来评估H&N癌症放射线的患者间质定位。方法和材料:本研究考虑了用于H&N IMRT的三种基于CT的IGRT模式:kV锥束(Synergy,Elekta),MV锥束(MVision,Siemens)和MV扇形束(TomoTherapy)。测量了我的后外侧,颅尾和前后尺寸的每日变化。 CTV到PTV的余量是使用2.0∑ +0.7σ计算的,其中∑和σ分别是系统误差和随机定位误差。还研究了患者特征(即体重,体重减轻)对普通患者设置的影响。结果:回顾性分析了117例患者的3302次CT扫描。 KVCBCT的内侧,颅尾和前后方向的平均分度位移(±标准偏差)分别为0.5±1.5,-0.3±2.0、0.3±1.7 mm(MVCT),0.2±1.9,-0.2±2.4和0.0±1.7 mm(MVCT) MVCBCT为0.0±1.8、0.5±1.7和0.8±3.0 mm。对于MVCBCT,30.2%的患者在一个平移方向上的位移大于3 mm,而MVCT和KVCBCT分别为11.4%和3.4%。平均而言,MVCBCT的系统误差(横向和垂直方向)和随机设置误差均大于KVCBCT和MVCT。对于KVCBCT,MVCT和MVCBCT,最大的CTV到PTV的均匀边距分别为3.0、4.6和7.4毫米。对于评估的特征以及在早期,中期和晚期治疗过程中,未观察到相对于平移方向的设置误差的统计学显着差异。结论:H&N IMRT中CTV到PTV的余量可能是成像方式的函数。这些数据表明,相比于KVCBCT较小的3 mm裕度,分别适用于MVCT和MVCBCT的5mm和7 mm较大的均匀裕度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号