首页> 外文会议>2010 7th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management >Comparison between two inventory decision models for a two-echelon dual-channel distribution system
【24h】

Comparison between two inventory decision models for a two-echelon dual-channel distribution system

机译:两级双渠道分销系统的两种库存决策模型之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

Business modes have been changing our life with more application of Internet in supply-chain/logistics distribution system. This paper investigates two inventory-decision models of a two-echelon dual-channel distribution system consists of a manufacturer with an Internet-enabled channel at the top echelon and a retailer store at the bottom echelon. Firstly, the joint production and pricing decisions are made with a centralized view, and then under the decentralized system, the manufacturer only operates an E-channel while the retailer operates a traditional channel, their own production/ordering and pricing are made to maximize their own expected profits with a Stackelberg game. Finally, some inferences are developed by comparisons between two decisions models, and a critical conclusion is that, a franchise outlet/two part tariff contract, designed by the manufacturer, as the Stackelberg game leader, can not ensure the coordination of dual-channel system under price-dependent demand and the condition that the retailer has pricing power for traditional channel.
机译:随着Internet在供应链/物流配送系统中的更多应用,业务模式已经改变了我们的生活。本文研究了一个两级双渠道分销系统的两种库存决策模型,该模型由一个制造商和一个位于底部的零售商组成,制造商的顶部是一个具有Internet通道的制造商,底部是一个零售商。首先,在集中视图的基础上制定联合生产和定价决策,然后在去中心化系统下,制造商仅运营E渠道,而零售商运营传统渠道,则他们自己的生产/订购和定价将使其最大化自己通过Stackelberg游戏获得的预期利润。最后,通过比较两个决策模型得出了一些推论,一个关键的结论是,由制造商作为Stackelberg游戏的领导者设计的特许经营网点/两部分资费合同不能确保双通道系统的协调。在价格依赖性需求和零售商具有传统渠道定价权的条件下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号