首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization >Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF and GenoType MTBDRplus for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis
【24h】

Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF and GenoType MTBDRplus for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis

机译:Xpert MTB / RIF与GenoType MTBDRplus在结核病快速诊断中的比较

获取原文

摘要

Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid) and GenoType MTBDRplus (Hain Lifescience) are two widely used tests for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. The aim of this study is to compare Xpert MTB/RIF and GenoType MTBDRplus to determine overall accuracy of diagnosis using these two tests. Based on search on PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases, publications were identified that compared Xpert MTB/RIF and GenoType MTBDRplus on the same dataset. A total of 6 studies with 4921 specimens were selected. Based on sensitivity and specificity, a pooled estimation of diagnostic odd ratio (DOR) and area under summary ROC curve (AUC) was calculated based on Random-Effect model. Both assays showed encouraging results for tuberculosis diagnosis but Xpert MTB/RIF depicted slightly better results based on recent studies.
机译:Xpert MTB / RIF(造父变星)和GenoType MTBDRplus(Hain Lifescience)是用于快速诊断结核病的两种广泛使用的测试方法。这项研究的目的是比较Xpert MTB / RIF和GenoType MTBDRplus,以确定使用这两种测试的总体诊断准确性。根据对PubMed,Embase和Google Scholar数据库的搜索,确定了在同一数据集上比较Xpert MTB / RIF和GenoType MTBDRplus的出版物。总共选择了6个研究与4921个标本。基于敏感性和特异性,基于随机效应模型计算诊断奇数比(DOR)和汇总ROC曲线下面积(AUC)的汇总估计。两种测定均显示出令人鼓舞的结核病诊断结果,但根据最近的研究,Xpert MTB / RIF的结果略好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号