首页> 外文会议> >Analysing RateMyProfessors Evaluations Across Institutions, Disciplines, and Cultures: The Tell-Tale Signs of a Good Professor
【24h】

Analysing RateMyProfessors Evaluations Across Institutions, Disciplines, and Cultures: The Tell-Tale Signs of a Good Professor

机译:跨机构,学科和文化对RateMyProfessors评估进行分析:一位好教授的讲故事的标志

获取原文

摘要

Can we tell a good professor from their students' comments? And are there differences between what is considered to be a good professor by different student groups? We use a large corpus of student evaluations collected from the RateMyProfessors website, covering different institutions, disciplines, and cultures, and perform several comparative experiments and analyses aimed to answer these two questions. Our results indicate that (1) we can reliably classify good professors from poor professors with an accuracy of over 90%, and (2) we can separate the evaluations made for good professors by different groups with accuracies in the range of 71-89%. Furthermore, a qualitative analysis performed using topic modeling highlights the aspects of interest for different student groups.
机译:我们可以从他们学生的评论中告诉一位好教授吗?在不同的学生群体中,什么被认为是一位优秀的教授,两者之间有区别吗?我们使用从RateMyProfessors网站收集的大量学生评估资料,涵盖不同的机构,学科和文化,并进行了一些比较实验和分析,旨在回答这两个问题。我们的结果表明(1)我们可以可靠地将优秀教授与贫困教授进行分类,准确率可达到90%以上;(2)我们可以将不同小组对优秀教授所做的评估分开,其准确性在71-89%的范围内。此外,使用主题建模进行的定性分析突出了不同学生群体感兴趣的方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号