首页> 外文会议>Congress on forensic engineering >Hurricane Andrew: Whatever Happened to My Argument to Abolish Prescriptive Building Codes?
【24h】

Hurricane Andrew: Whatever Happened to My Argument to Abolish Prescriptive Building Codes?

机译:安德鲁飓风:我对废除建筑规范的争论发生了什么?

获取原文

摘要

At the first forensic engineering congress, shortly after investigating damage to residential structures from Hurricane Andrew, I presented a paper on the shortcomings of the prescriptive building code. Specifically, I argued that a prescriptive code is typically based upon past experience, that this experience is out of date as soon as it is acquired, and that prescriptions will always break down at the margins of design innovation. I concluded by proposing that all residential structures in areas of severe hazard be engineered to withstand the expected loads. As noted, Hurricane Andrew damaged houses throughout southern Dade County, Florida. Despite a strict building code, after a 31 year hiatus from major hurricane damage, the region's housing stock proved much more vulnerable than expected. However, setting aside the prevalence of lost roof covering, broken windows, and the complete destruction of mobile homes, relatively few wood-frame houses suffered severe structural damage. Consequently, those that did suffer damage became objects of intense investigation and engineering scrutiny. The results of that scrutiny included changes to the Building Code. While these changes are welcome and necessary, they repeat the historical pattern of codifying elements necessary to fix problems observed in the housing stock that suffered damage. Among these, damage to gable-end walls stands out among issues that led to Code revisions. Presently, with an additional 23 years of experience since Hurricane Andrew, and with more recent experiences from other storms, Florida retains a largely prescriptive Residential Building Code. However, for High Velocity Hurricane Zones, the Code directs the building designer to use the performance standards of the Florida Building Code for Buildings, based upon the International Building Code. Therefore, at least for those areas considered to be High Velocity Hurricane Zones, Florida does not allow for the use of the prescriptions contained within the Code. This paper reviews the Code evolution briefly, and revisits the question of whether and how well a prescriptive code can adequately insure the integrity of residential structures in Florida.
机译:在第一届法医工程大会上,在调查了安德鲁飓风对住宅结构造成的破坏后不久,我提交了一篇有关规定性建筑规范的缺陷的论文。具体来说,我认为规范性代码通常基于过去的经验,这种经验一旦获得就已经过时,并且处方总是会在设计创新的边缘被破坏。最后,我建议对所有严重危险区域的住宅结构进行工程设计,以承受预期的负荷。如前所述,安德鲁飓风破坏了佛罗里达州达德县南部的房屋。尽管有严格的建筑法规,在遭受重大飓风破坏31年后,该地区的住房存量比预期的要脆弱得多。然而,撇开丢失的屋顶覆盖物,破损的窗户以及对移动房屋的完全破坏的普遍性而言,很少有木结构房屋遭受严重的结构破坏。因此,遭受破坏的人员成为了深入研究和工程审查的对象。审查的结果包括对《建筑规范》的更改。尽管这些变化是受欢迎且必要的,但它们重复了编纂要素的历史模式,这些要素是解决遭受破坏的房屋存货所必须解决的问题的。其中,对山墙端墙的损坏在导致修订本的众多问题中脱颖而出。目前,佛罗里达州自安德鲁飓风以来已有23年的工作经验,而其他风暴带来的最新经验则保留了大部分规范性的《住宅建筑规范》。但是,对于高速飓风区,该规范指示建筑设计师根据国际建筑规范,使用佛罗里达建筑规范的性能标准。因此,至少对于那些被认为是高速飓风区的地区,佛罗里达州不允许使用本规范中包含的规定。本文简要回顾了规范的演变,并重新讨论了规范性规范是否以及如何能够充分确保佛罗里达州住宅结构的完整性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号