首页> 外文会议>Congress on forensic engineering >Hurricane Andrew: Whatever Happened to My Argument to Abolish Prescriptive Building Codes?
【24h】

Hurricane Andrew: Whatever Happened to My Argument to Abolish Prescriptive Building Codes?

机译:飓风安德鲁:无论我的论点都发生了废除规定的建筑规范吗?

获取原文

摘要

At the first forensic engineering congress, shortly after investigating damage to residential structures from Hurricane Andrew, I presented a paper on the shortcomings of the prescriptive building code. Specifically, I argued that a prescriptive code is typically based upon past experience, that this experience is out of date as soon as it is acquired, and that prescriptions will always break down at the margins of design innovation. I concluded by proposing that all residential structures in areas of severe hazard be engineered to withstand the expected loads. As noted, Hurricane Andrew damaged houses throughout southern Dade County, Florida. Despite a strict building code, after a 31 year hiatus from major hurricane damage, the region's housing stock proved much more vulnerable than expected. However, setting aside the prevalence of lost roof covering, broken windows, and the complete destruction of mobile homes, relatively few wood-frame houses suffered severe structural damage. Consequently, those that did suffer damage became objects of intense investigation and engineering scrutiny. The results of that scrutiny included changes to the Building Code. While these changes are welcome and necessary, they repeat the historical pattern of codifying elements necessary to fix problems observed in the housing stock that suffered damage. Among these, damage to gable-end walls stands out among issues that led to Code revisions. Presently, with an additional 23 years of experience since Hurricane Andrew, and with more recent experiences from other storms, Florida retains a largely prescriptive Residential Building Code. However, for High Velocity Hurricane Zones, the Code directs the building designer to use the performance standards of the Florida Building Code for Buildings, based upon the International Building Code. Therefore, at least for those areas considered to be High Velocity Hurricane Zones, Florida does not allow for the use of the prescriptions contained within the Code. This paper reviews the Code evolution briefly, and revisits the question of whether and how well a prescriptive code can adequately insure the integrity of residential structures in Florida.
机译:在第一个法医学工程大会上,在调查飓风安德鲁飓风结构损坏后不久,我介绍了一篇关于规范性建筑规范的缺点的论文。具体而言,我认为规范性代码通常基于过去的经验,这一经验一旦获得,就会在收购时立即到期,并且该处方将始终在设计创新的边缘处分解。我通过提出严重危害领域的所有住宅结构被设计成了,以抵御预期负荷。如上所述,在佛罗里达州南德德县的飓风安德鲁损坏了房屋。尽管建筑规则严格,但在飓风主要飓风损害的31年的急使之后,该地区的房屋股票证明了比预期更容易受到影响。然而,抛开损失屋顶覆盖,破碎的窗户和移动房屋完全破坏的普遍存在,相对较少的木框架房屋遭受严重的结构损伤。因此,那些遭受损害的人成为激烈调查和工程审查的对象。该审查结果包括对建筑码的更改。虽然欢迎和必要的变革,但他们重复了在遭受损害的住房股票中观察到的问题所需的编纂元素的历史模式。其中,山墙壁的损坏在导致代码修订的问题中脱颖而出。目前,由于飓风安德鲁以来的另外23年的经验,以及最近的其他风暴的经验,佛罗里达州仍然是一项大幅规范的住宅建筑规范。然而,对于高速飓风区域,代码指示建筑设计师根据国际建筑码使用佛罗里达州建筑码的性能标准。因此,至少对于被认为是高速飓风区的区域,佛罗里达不允许使用代码中包含的处方。本文简要介绍了代码演变,并重新评估了规范性代码是否能够充分确保佛罗里达州住宅结构的完整性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号