Debating Cybersecurity or Securing a Debate? (Position Paper)

摘要

Although inheriting from a well-established literature, Argumentation is currently emerging more and more as a prosperous field of Artificial Intelligence. This paves the way to applications different from traditional ones, as legal reasoning. This paper sets the scene of a large-scale work whose purpose is to develop an Argumentation-based reasoning tool dedicated to the assessment of Cybersecurity and its (re)configuration. Concurrently, and for the first time, we plan to extend the same framework in order to check the vulnerabilities of a debate itself, preventing those attacks aimed at manipulating the result of a decision-making process (e.g., an attack/countermeasure analysis).